Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Rhythmnation2004 2

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

[edit] Rhythmnation2004

(Final 0/8/0) Ended 23:40 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Rhythmnation2004 (talk • contribs) – Rhythmnation2004 )

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog and Category:Administrative backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.

A: I would do any and all things I can do to help make Wikipedia a better place, free of conflict and disagreements.

2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

A: I have spent hours creating pages to detail La Toya Jackson's discography. I successfully created pages for every album and single released by her. I have also contributed many images to Wikipedia, and have contributed tons of valuable information, especially on the Birth certificate and Vivian Gaither High School articles.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: I have had conflicts over editing in the past and I have dealt with it by requesting a mediation, which never happened. As an administrator, I will help conflicts by offering my third-party opinion and helping to steer things in the write direction. As a trained conflict mediator in Hillsborough County, Florida, I believe that I am excellent at handling conflicts.

In response to aeropagicita's comment, I am a trained mediator under commission for the School District of Hillsborough County. This is not statement of personal belief, but a legal fact.

General comments

• Note: This nominee's most recent RfA ended September 17, 2006 (two days ago) failing (1/7/0). --Aaron 22:30, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
• This user has been blocked for disruption... --Alex ^(talk) 22:38, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Discussion (for expressing views without numbering)

Support

Oppose

1. Strong Oppose - Trolling of RFA. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 22:19, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
2. Oppose, his last RfA closed the day before yesterday. _{J Di}^talk 22:20, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
3. Oppose for obvious reasons. - Mailer Diablo 22:23, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
4. Quit wasting our time. Dragons flight 22:29, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
5. Oppose, with the strong suggestion to the nominee that he withdraw his nomination. This sort of action will not help your cause once you've attained the knowledge and maturity to be taken seriously as an admin nominee. --Aaron 22:30, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
6. Very Strong oppose User obviously has no idea about the rules here. This is my 3rd opinion regarding this user's RfAs. As said, please stop wasting everybody's time and come back when you are ready. Also, please read your previous RfA to see where it went wrong, you might learn something. --Alex ^(talk) 22:32, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
7. Strong Oppose For obvious reasons. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 22:42, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
8. Strong Oppose RfA trolling. --CFIF ☎ ⋐ 22:59, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Neutral

• See Rhythmnation2004's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool.

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.