Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Post Falls Man

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

[edit] Post Falls Man

Voice your opinion! (1/15/1) Ended 23:27, 2006-08-10 (UTC)

Post Falls Man (talk • contribs) – YOUR DESCRIPTION OF THE USER Post Falls Man 16:56, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I accept the nomination

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.

A:I would take on helping other articles with little information of not informative at all. And before setting up a deletion process I would attempt to make a contact for the user who created it. I would request they add more information or even let me take matters. If it is a no go I will fix the problem or have another admin help me along the way.

2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

A:Clarkia, Idaho is one of my articles and I am proud because the article is informative. And Chilco and Garwood, Idaho I am proud but they are still a "work in progress".

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A:Well I have had a problem in the past with one W Marsh but I feel that with stress you are on alert which in my opinion is okay by me with future stress I would say that I will deal with it as I deal with all my other stress calmfully and take great care not to mess up.

Comments

• See Post Falls Man's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool.

Support

1. I think Post Falls Man would help wikipedia alot and I think that we could all benifit from Post Falls Man being an administratior. And befor you judge try looking at the articles he created. Azythia Goes On 10:36 AM August 10 2006 (UTC)

   User's only edits are on this nom. Special:Contributions/Azythia_Goes_On - Tangotango 17:48, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

   The nominee removed the above comment by Tango as shown in this diff.—WAvegetarian•(talk) 18:46, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

   Sent to WP:RFCU. Computerjoe's talk 19:24, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Oppose

1. Not enough experience, including almost nothing in the Wikipedia: namespace. Unfortunetly I must recommend withdrawing this nom, as it's unlikely to succeed. BryanG^(talk) 17:28, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
2. Oppose per BryanG AdamBiswanger1 17:29, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
3. I have to agree with BryanG. Almost nothing to judge. --Kbdank71 17:31, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
4. You don't need to be an administrator to improve articles and contact users about them.--Andeh 17:37, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
5. Oppose. For, more than anything, the insane run-on sentence in A1. Themindset 17:45, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
6. Oppose per the first attempt which I untranscluded from the bottom after it the page was deleted a couple of hours ago. This user doesn't seem to have a use for admin tools or even know what they are.—WAvegetarian•(talk) 17:50, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

   And because the nominee has removed critical comments from this AfD as noted in the support section.—WAvegetarian•(talk) 18:46, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

7. Oppose per Kbdank, Andeh, and WAveg. Joe 18:07, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
8. Oppose If did remove critical comments, then lacks understanding. :) Dlohcierekim 18:50, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
9. Oppose. G.He 19:18, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
10. Oppose per above Computerjoe's talk 19:21, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
11. Oppose per all above. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 19:42, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
12. Oppose per all above. Wikipediarules2221 19:47, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
13. Oppose Unfortunately, there is almost no experience, not admin quality. --WillMak050389 20:07, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
14. Suggest withdrawl —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-08-10 20:34Z
15. Oppose and speedy close of this RFA, there is no chance that consensus in favor is going to come out of this. To the user who started this RFA, please build up experience and contributions on Wikipedia before beginning an RFA. Perhaps after some experience is obtained you could have a legitimate shot at becoming a Wikipedia administrator.--Jersey Devil 20:36, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Neutral

1. Hey it is Post Falls Man I agree with you Andypandy but you can do so much more as an administrator not just improving articles but dont you know what I am talking about.

Hey it is Post Falls Man again for you sir the main reasons for becoming an admin is because you can Delete, Protect from vandalism and basic page protection as for you Themindset you shouldnt discriminate just because my answer was one sentance here i will fix that for you.

Post Falls Man would be a good administrator because he has done quite the amount of contributions. For instance Clarkia, Idaho or Chilco, Idaho or even Garwood, Idaho. And many other contributions. I think that he would be great because he has helped those whom were trying to get there articles "Moving" along the process such as Melified Man for instance. I will accept all questions.

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.