Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Hornetman16

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

[edit] Hornetman16

Final (0/4/1) Ended Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:44:35 (UTC)

Hornetman16 (talk • contribs) – I have been using Wikipedia long enough to understand what i should/shouldn't do on this website. I may be just 16 but I'm responsible. Please give me real consideration like you do everyone else, PLEASE!!! Hornetman16 13:45, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

PLEASE BE HONEST ON YOU APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL OR EVEN NEUTRALISM!!!

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog and Category:Administrative backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.

A: I intend on keeping the site family friendly which includes deleting nude photos. I also intend strictly devoting my time to keeping the site within the range of not offending anyone. ESPECIALY CHRISTIANS!!!

2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?

A:Haines City High School, because it's my school and that was one of the ways that I show school loyalty and spirit to HCHS

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A:No, not really. If I ever get any I just rely on God to help me.

General comments

• See Hornetman16's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.

Discussion

• "I will not with draw my application. I believe I can do it!" - from my Talk page. (aeropagitica) 17:42, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Support

Oppose

1. Oppose. Good lord, no. SuperMachine 17:11, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
2. Oppose. Sorry, with only 243 edits and poorly-constructed self-nomination this RfA can only go one way. Wikipedia is not censored, so removing nude photographs without community support is a wilful abuse of admin rights. Try an editor review and get some admin coaching instead, all the while adding to the article space with content, reliable sources and references. Try again in 6-8 months' time. (aeropagitica) 17:20, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
3. Oppose Every time you inflict censorship upon Wikipedia, it makes the baby Jesus cry.
   More seriously, you don't have the edit and policy experience necessary to make a good admin. EVula // talk // ☯ // 17:23, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
4. Oppose. I agree with Crz. Assuming your self-nomination is serious (and your answer to question 3 above makes me wonder) perhaps, Hornetman, you could withdraw your nomination and spend more time looking at what Wikipedia is all about in a sense larger than wishing to maintain one or two articles before asking for administrator tools. Being an admin isn't a "status" thing, it's a "have a few more tools" thing. Please don't think that this view has anything to do with your age, it has to do with your lack of experience of Wikipedia. Regards, Tonywalton  | Talk 17:43, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Neutral

1. NEUTRALISM! MORAL SUPPORTISM! SUGGEST WITHDRAWAL...ISM - crz crztalk 17:32, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.