Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Haham hanuka 4

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

[edit] Haham hanuka

Final (0/6/0) ended 08:54, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Haham hanuka (talk • contribs) – I have much experience on Wikipedia, have been here for more than 2 years, my previous nom was rejected just beacuse I did not write about myself enough.

My main work here is to "make Wikipedia looks better" - sometimes by detecting vandals and reverting them. Please give me a chance. I won't let you down. --Haham hanuka 07:43, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

I've cancelled my nomination. --Haham hanuka 08:54, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Support

Oppose

1. Oppose. Malformed RfA, didn't even nom himself or accept before putting himself on the main page, and this subpage is malformed. --Rory096 07:38, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

   Does it make me a bad admin? --Haham hanuka 07:45, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

   Yes. It shows you don't know much about how things are done around here, and that you won't even read the top of the RfA page telling you to read the guide to RfAs, which gives you an easy way to make an nom- on your 4th attempt! --Rory096 07:47, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

   Actually it's just the 2nd try (though you were opposed for having a malformed RfA the first time, you'd think you'd fix it this time); why is this page at 4? --Rory096 07:49, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

2. Oppose. The user rarely if ever uses edit summaries. Has been seem to label articles as POV without explanation (has done this on many occassions). Has attempted to close AfD discussions despite not being an admin and also involved in the discussion. Getting involved in 3RR and then using anonymous IP address rather than logons to bypass the block. I don't think behaviour like this is what we want in a admin. Sorry. Ben W Bell talk 07:53, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
3. Oppose, fails 1FA. - Mailer Diablo 08:02, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
4. Oppose. Edit summary use and per Ben.Voice-of-All^Talk 08:05, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

   So I'll use edit summaries, just because I didn't use it I cannot be an admin? Give me a chance! --Haham hanuka 08:15, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

5. Oppose Needs to learn to write a paragraph on why they believe they should be admin. Appears to believe that edit count is everything.--Andeh 08:37, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
6. Oppose. There's no way I can support and RfA where the questions for the candidate are "gone" and are unanswered. --Lord Deskana ^{Dark Lord of the Sith} 08:48, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

   They're not "gone," the RfA is just way malformed and never had them in the first place. --Rory096 08:55, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

   That's partially my point. --Lord Deskana ^{Dark Lord of the Sith} 09:20, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Neutral

Comments User's last 2000 edits.Voice-of-All^Talk 08:09, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

--Viewing contribution data for user Haham hanuka (over the 2000 edit(s) shown on this page)-- (FAQ)
Time range: 127 approximate day(s) of edits on this page
Most recent edit on: 8hr (UTC) -- 02, Jun, 2006 || Oldest edit on: 14hr (UTC) -- 27, January, 2006
Overall edit summary use (last 1000 edits): Major edits: 53.45% Minor edits: 27.78%
Average edits per day: 15.37 (for last 500 edit(s))
Article edit summary use (last 821 edits) : Major article edits: 63.21% Minor article edits: 29.57%
Analysis of edits (out of all 2000 edits shown of this page):
Notable article edits (creation/expansion/rewrites/sourcing): 2% (40)
Minor article edits (small content/info/reference additions): 1.35% (27)
Superficial article edits (grammar/spelling/wikify/links/tagging): 55.65% (1113)
Breakdown of all edits:
Unique pages edited: 1127 | Average edits per page: 1.77 | Edits on top: 6.45%
Significant edits (non-minor/reverts): 5.25% (105 edit(s))
Minor edits (non-reverts): 61.05% (1221 edit(s))
Marked reverts (reversions/text removal): 7.2% (144 edit(s))
Unmarked edits: 26.5% (530 edit(s))
Edits by Wikipedia namespace:
Article: 83.3% (1666) | Article talk: 4.1% (82)
User: 2.1% (42) | User talk: 4.4% (88)
Wikipedia: 3.6% (72) | Wikipedia talk: 0% (0)
Image: 1% (20)
Template: 0.4% (8)
Category: 0.5% (10)
Portal: 0.25% (5)
Help: 0% (0)
MediaWiki: 0% (0)
Other talk pages: 0.35% (7)

• See Haham hanuka's edit summary usage with Mathbot's tool.
• Count with Tool2:

Username Haham_hanuka
Total edits 5839
Distinct pages edited 3526
Average edits/page 1.656
First edit 23:34, September 29, 2004

(main) 5025
Talk 152
User 151
User talk 159
Image 82
Image talk 1
Template 27
Template talk 8
Category 72
Category talk 1
Wikipedia 161

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.