Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Groupempty

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

[edit] Groupempty

Final (0/6/0); Ended 17:30, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Groupempty (talk • contribs) - I am so very proud of myself of being a sysop. This nomination is for the truth. I will try to be a good sysop and then get some new features. FIN! Groupempty 14:54, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:


Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Administrative backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
A: I can help them by blocking, protecting articles, and reverting them (although I am using TW, but that is still okay.).
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A: Not exactly. And I am pleased you are operating me once again. Thanks!
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: I NEVER cause stress on my body parts.
General comments
  • See Groupempty's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.

Please keep criticism constructive and polite.

Discussion

Support

Oppose

  1. Oppose - Only About 30 Edits and You are applying for Adminship is not a good Idea.Wait till you have atleast over 2000 Edits to apply..--Cometstyles 15:08, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
  2. Strong oppose totally inexperienced in terms of time and the edits of today suggest we might be dealing with someone who's been around before. It's pretty weird to stumble upon AIV, RFCN, Twinkle, and many other things all within your first few hours of being here. Metros232 15:41, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
  3. Strong oppose As stated you have a minimal amount of contributions to Wikipedia, based on that I am left to assume you have very little experience with Wikipedia policies and protocol. --Ozgod 16:01, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
  4. Oppose. Initial version of this RfA makes it pretty clear it was only intended as vandalism. Kafziel Talk 16:05, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
  5. Oppose You have too few edits and your answers to the questions do not lead me to believe that you are ready for or fully understand what is involved with sysop tools. Darthgriz98 16:30, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
  6. Oppose Is it just me, or are similar RfAs increasing lately? Another WP:SNOW case. - Anas Talk? 16:31, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Neutral

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../r/e/q/Wikipedia%7ERequests_for_adminship_Groupempty_2efd.html"