Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Flameviper12

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

[edit] Flameviper12

Final (0/7/0) ended 16:22, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Flameviper12 (talk • contribs) – I'm nominating myself. Yes, I am terribly conceited in doing this. Yes, I do realize I just got off of an indefinite block. But still. I do make valuable contributions a nd occasionally revert cvandalism when bored. The only reason I vandalise really is so I have something to revert. Durn admins get all the fun.

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I hereby accept – Flame-viper 12^(talk) 15:33, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Support

Oppose

1. Oppose troll. Close this ASAP -- Samir धर्म 15:38, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
2. Strong oppose. Blocked four times in the past for vandalism, page-moves, trolling, and personal attacks via email. This user just got off an indef. block 20 minutes ago. — TheKMan^talk 15:41, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
3. Oppose Just off an indef block. Request to B'crats to pull the plug on this one quickly. --Srikeit^{(talk ¦ ✉)} 15:43, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
4. Oppose, obviously. --ⁿɡ͡b Nick Boalch\^talk 15:54, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
5. Good grief. Thatcher131 16:07, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
6. Oppose. I am sorry to vote oppose. --Bhadani 16:12, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

   Oppose – due to history of vandalism – Gurch 16:23, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

7. What? "Just got off an indef block" doesn't make me want to have this guy in charge of blocking and protection. Mr. Lefty _{Talk to me!} 16:23, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Neutral

Comments

• See Flame's edit summary usage with Mathbot's tool.

Questions for the candidate

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.