Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Cyberjunkie

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for adminship. Please do not modify it.

[edit] Cyberjunkie

final (63/0/0) ending 00:45 October 17, 2005 (UTC)

Cyberjunkie (talk • contribs) – Cyberjunkie has been contributing to Wikipedia since November 2004. He has over 6300 edits, with about 2600 in the article namespace, and an even spread across the other namespaces. He would be one of the most level-headed contributors I've had the pleasure of working with. He makes good article contributions; is always cool even when the editing gets hot; never resorts to personal attacks and is quick to defend others against attacks; is free with compliments and encouragement, especially to newbies; does his share of vandal-fighting; and generally shows all-round good judgement and a friendly demeanour. Snottygobble | Talk 00:45, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
I humbly accept. Thanks for the kind words!–Cyberjunkie | Talk 07:49, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

Support

  1. In before sticky nominator. --Merovingian (t) (c) 08:18, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
  2. Excellent contributor to Adelaide and Australia-related articles. Frequently noticed having reverted vandalism. --Scott Davis Talk 09:15, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
  3. Support as per nom, an excellent contributor to work with. --Vsion 10:10, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
  4. Support obviously. Snottygobble | Talk 11:46, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
  5. support - a dillegent and constructive editor. works constructively with others to solve problems, and I've never seen Cyberjunkie involved in petty squabbles (or even more serious disputes). Adz 12:21, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
  6. Support, per nomination. Excellent Australian contributor. --bainer (talk) 12:54, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
  7. Support, per nomination. Plays well with others Qaz (talk) 13:10, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
  8. Strong Support. Cyberjunkie is brilliant Australian editor whose work is always of a very high standard. Extending administrative privileges to Cyberjunkie will be of immense benefit to Wikipedia. -- Ianblair23 13:15, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
  9. Strong Support.vcxlor 14:53, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
  10. Strong support. He should've been an admin months ago. Ambi 15:26, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
  11. Support. "I thought he already was one!" --fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 15:41, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
  12. Support I had no idea that CJ was not an admin. User:Nichalp/sg 18:37, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
  13. Support Private Butcher 18:43, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
  14. Support Dlyons493 Talk 19:29, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
  15. Support CambridgeBayWeather 19:59, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
  16. Support per nom. Christopher Parham (talk) 20:25, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
  17. Support--JAranda | yeah 21:28, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
  18. Support. I thought CJ was an admin, too. I am sure the name tag will give it away in the future. >: Roby Wayne Talk • Hist• E@ 21:33, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
  19. Support Geoff/Gsl 22:03, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
  20. Support Martyman 22:08, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
  21. Support--nixie 23:11, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
  22. Support - not already an admin? Astounding! If I had to start up my own wiki and pick fifty wikipedians to be admins on it, Cyberjunkie would be on that list. Give him one of those special gold-plated mops! Grutness...wha? 00:20, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
  23. Support--User:AYArktos | Talk 00:45, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
  24. Support. RFA has had a lot of candidates lately, huh? Good thing that this one is another of the "excellent" kind. Titoxd(?!?) 00:58, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
  25. Default support.  Denelson83  02:24, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
  26. Support Ryan Norton T | @ | C 02:49, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
  27. Is it too late to add one more support vote? - Lucky 6.9 05:30, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
  28. Cool. --JuntungWu 07:14, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
  29. Exactly. Slac speak up! 09:34, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
  30. Support. Why isn't he already? JPD 10:05, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
  31. Support. Friday (talk) 15:48, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
  32. Support Astrotrain 17:46, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
  33. Support. →Journalist >>talk<< 21:05, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
  34. Support {{Template:RFC cliche}} Bratschetalk | Esperanza 00:01, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
  35. Support --ZappaZ 04:20, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
  36. Support --Seems like he knows what he's doing ;) James Pinnell 05:28, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
  37. Support — mæstro t/c4 05:54, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
  38. Support, has done very good work on Australia and New Zealand articles/portals, shows good judgement.-gadfium 07:09, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
  39. Support: good candidate. Filiocht | The kettle's on 09:10, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
  40. Support Cyberjunkie is seen by me around the place and I happily support their admin-ing. Alf melmac 15:23, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
  41. FireFox 16:40, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
  42. Support - of course - a first rate Wikipedian. I'm amazed he's not an Admin' already.. ...en passant! 17:10, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
  43. Support. -Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 23:53, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
  44. Strong Support. ITHAWO. -- Chuq 00:10, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
  45. Support; definitely. Antandrus (talk) 01:44, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
  46. Support Zzyzx11 (Talk) 01:54, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
  47. Support. El_C 03:27, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
  48. -- (drini's page|☎) 03:33, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
  49. Support. the wub "?!" 11:51, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
  50. Support. --NormanEinstein 14:01, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
  51. You dare tell us what to do? You... you are a good and experienced editor! Cyberjunkie...
    Get
    out
    of
    my
    head! — JIP | Talk 14:17, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
  52. Support, I've been waiting for this one! Alphax τεχ 11:01, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
  53. Support. ∞Who?¿? 08:25, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
  54. (CTU) 5002 rebotcO 51 ,24:01 ™RAVIKLA eciohc doog ...yug dedeah level troppuS
  55. Support. --Bhadani 13:18, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
  56. - Guettarda 13:37, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
  57. Support. --Mozasaur 15:44, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
  58. Support. Seems good enough.  BD2412 talk 05:47, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
  59. What Nichalp said. encephalon 12:03, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
  60. Support. a first rate user -- Ian ≡ talk 15:05, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
  61. Support -- Francs2000 23:43, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
  62. Support for an excellent contributor and editor --Saluyot 02:01, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
  63. Support Nominator's name is pretty wierd. Image:Smilie.gifMolotov (talk)
    04:43, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

Oppose

Neutral

Comments

Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
A. I imagine my main sysop activity will be combating vandalism, something I do pretty frequently already. Although I tend to shy away from Afd – because I find the atmosphere a little…icky – I will continue to regularly vote there, and perhaps close some non-contentious discussions in the backlog. I also intend to assist newbie’s and other users, and to mediate in any conflicts taking place in any of the 2,300+ articles I currently monitor.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A. I don't keep a record of articles I either write or contribute to, so you'll have to review my contributions to get a more specific idea. In article space, though I do write new articles, I mostly expand upon or attempt to improve existing ones. My primary aim is to improve coverage of Australia- and Adelaide-related topics and issues, but I also dabble in more general articles. My major work has been in templates and portals.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A. I suppose I've been relatively fortunate in that I've not been involved in any serious conflicts, and certainly none personal – although I was once called "bossy" by an editor with whom I have since worked amicably :). Any disputes about content I have with others or others have with me have been worked out constructively on talk pages. I've skirted around the Skyring issue but have recently become more involved, and am prepared to weigh-in further if necessary. Most importantly, I dislike confrontation and will seek compromise wherever possible. I find Wikipedia therapeutic; however, every-now-and-then I will be on a (leniant) Wikibreak due to "real life" circumstances.--Cyberjunkie | Talk 07:49, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../r/e/q/Wikipedia%7ERequests_for_adminship_Cyberjunkie_e799.html"