Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Chaz365

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

[edit] Chaz365

Final (0/22/2) ended 21:24, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Chaz365 (talk • contribs) – This kid is seriously awesomeChaz365 04:34, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

I accept, thank me for nominating me.:

Support

Oppose

1. Speedy Oppose way too new, created 3 articles that were quickly placed in AFD as vanity related, --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 04:38, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
2. Oppose - New user, please consider removing your nomination, try again in 4-5 months. --lightdarkness ^(talk) 04:48, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
3. Speedy Oppose per Jaranda, and suggestion of withdrawl per Lightdarkness. Terse answer to questions don't help, either. -- Jjjsixsix ^(t)/_(c) @ 04:52, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
4. Speedy Oppose per above. deeptrivia (talk) 04:53, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
5. Oppose. Too new (e.g., user made his first edit less than an hour ago). Suggest withdrawl. — TheKMan^talk 04:53, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
6. Speedy Oppose all three of his contributions were speedy-ed as vanity. Palnu 04:54, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
7. Oppose per Palnu. Most created articles have either been speedied or are on AfD. A joke, WP:POINT-violating self-nomination. --Kinu ^t/_c 05:16, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
8. Oppose per above. I suggest withdrawing and trying again in a few months. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 05:33, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
9. Speedy oppose. Malformatted RFA and inability to make distinction with a self-nomination is an immediate and obvious reflection on the ability of the user to use the appropriate janitorial tools wisely. Elle _{vécut heureuse} ^{à jamais} (Be eudaimonic!) 05:35, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
10. Oppose suggest withdraw, per all above. xaosflux ^Talk/_CVU 05:44, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
11. Oppose per above. VegaDark 06:44, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
12. Oppose, too new, 17 edits and per all above. Is this meant to be a joke? --Terence Ong 07:56, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
13. Super Speedy Oppose Lets assume good faith. This newbie obviously has so little understanding of Wikipedia that he/she may that anybody can become an admin. You should withdraw this nom btw unless you want to be embarrassed. Gizza^{Chat ©} 08:16, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
14. Speedy Oppose per DaGizza. Computerjoe's talk 08:20, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
15. Oppose I'd hate to miss out on the shut out--Looper5920 09:38, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
16. Oppose. Hate to pile on, but this case demands an exception. Does anyone else suspect that this might be a joke nomination or is the candidate really that obnoxious? Cynical 10:58, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
17. Oppose. May be trying for a record anti-vote. ProhibitOnions 11:55, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
18. Oppose. Good grief. --Calton | Talk 13:24, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
19. Speedy Oppose per everybody.    GUÐSÞEGN   – UTEX – 16:31, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
20. Oppose, suggest withdrawal. - Mailer Diablo 18:51, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
21. Oppose, terrible nomination form. JaredW! 19:59, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
22. Is this a joke? Orane (t) (c) (e) 21:23, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Neutral

1. Neutral Not even worthy of a vote Deizio 13:20, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
2. {{welcome}}, That's all this new editor needs, not the embarassment of an accidental RFA. --Zsinj^Talk 17:02, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Comments

• Edit summary usage: 0% for major edits and 0% for minor edits. Based on the last 17 major and 0 minor edits in the article namespace. Mathbot 04:45, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• See Chaz365's edit count and contribution tree with Interiot's tool.
• Comment. Let's not pile it on. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 10:07, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• I wish him good luck. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bhadani (talk • contribs) .

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.

A. I'll do whatever is needed. I promise.

2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

A. Charles "Chaz" Miller - It's about my role model.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A. I just try and be civil and work it out.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.