Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Bormalagurski

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

[edit] Bormalagurski

Final (6/17/0) withdrawn by bureaucrat 21:10 26 March 2006 (UTC), ending 06:40, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Bormalagurski (talk • contribs) – My name is Boris, I'm from Vancouver, BC, Canada, My main hobby is editing Wikipedia Boris Malagurski ₪ 06:39, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: Boris Malagurski ₪

Support

1. Strong support - one of the most prominent member of serbian wikipedia. --Manojlo 08:01, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
2. Strong support --Jovanvb 08:55, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
3. Strong support --vlada 09:40, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
4. Strong support --Milan Tešovic 13:17, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
5. Very Weak Moral Support Although a prominent member of Serbian Wikipedia, his English edits are low. Nevertheless, he has proven himself in the Serbian Wikipedia. A potential admin in the future but not now. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 15:59, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
6. Strong support --estavisti 18:26, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Oppose

1. Oppose - This will get removed by a bureaucrat for the low edit count, but for what it's worth, I think that Bormalagurski's judgment is unreliable. Look at his changes to No Name (band) and Slobodan Milosevic. - Richardcavell 07:20, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
2. Strong oppose. Did not answer questions, did not give reasons for wanting to be admin, has practically no experience, etc. etc. etc. etc. JHMM13 (T | C) 07:28, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

   Serious suspicion that this user is trying to become admin to close the discussion on the Serbophobia AfD. If anyone here hasn't seen that page, there are a lot of sockpuppet allegations, interwiki voting, etc. etc. It's a cluster-F, and it's not easy to sift through the rubble, so if anyone would like to help out trying to calm the anger in there, it would seriously help. JHMM13 (T | C) 09:04, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

3. Oppose Please try again later. --Masssiveego 08:01, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
4. Oppose, obviously low edit count, but more troubling are some of the edits to Slobodan Milosevic pointed out by RichardCavell. --Deville (Talk) 08:18, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
5. Oppose don't even need to explain this one.--Looper5920 08:25, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
6. Strong Oppose, low edit count, did not answer questions, no experience, and I have a feeling that Manojlo is his sockpuppet.--TBC^{??? ??? ???} 08:57, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

   Manojlo is a contributor from Serbian Wikipedia. Accusation that someone is a sockpuppet without any rational explanation (just "suspecting") is very pure. --millosh (talk (sr:)) 12:16, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

   Is there any help against the people who are trying to undermine other user calling him sockpupet? --Manojlo 12:04, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

   Sorry, I'm just suspicious, as Manojlo's first edit was for the Serbophobia AfD nomination --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 17:23, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

7. Oppose and suggest withdrawal. Far too few edits in the English Wikipedia, and recently engaged in personal attacks. JIP | Talk 09:01, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
8. Oppose - no questions, no edits, no edit summaries no support vote -- Tawker 09:05, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
9. Strong Oppose Utterly unsuitable. POV warrior, no edit summaries, candidateship "strongly endorsed" by buddies and nobody else, need I go on? --kingboyk 11:31, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
10. Speedy Oppose. User clearly has a political agenda to push and is seeking adminship as a tool to help push that agenda. This nomination deserves to be speedy closed by a beaurocrat as clearly unsuitable. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:56, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
11. Strong Oppose you've got to be kidding! This user lacks experience alltogether. No summaries, no edits, no nothing. --Mmounties (Talk) 14:25, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
12. Oppose. This user is a Serbian nationalist partisan. Croatian historian 15:35, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
    1. Also note that Boris posted a "warning" on my talk page, claiming the comment above was a "personal attack", when it is only a statement of fact, and threatening me with being "blocked for disruption", i.e. because I voted against him. Boris has continously advocated Serbian nationalist positions, and defended Slobodan Milošević. I suspect he wants to be an admin to enforce Serbian nationalist viewpoints. I do not trust this user with admin access. Croatian historian 18:56, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
13. Oppose. Inexperience + low use of summaries. We have no record to go on really, so no option but to oppose. (Bormalagurski, you could be the best candidate in the world, but there is no way for us to know this. Please re-apply when you have some more experience - see Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Standards for a list of minimum standards) Mikker ^... 15:39, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
14. Strong Oppose In addition to the highly problematic edits noted by Richardcavell, one also has these comments in the talk pages: [1],[2], [3] [4]and has removed from talk other peoples comments for no reason and without an edit summary: [5]. JoshuaZ 16:58, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
15. Oppose. Doesn't meet my personal standards and the question of sock puppetry needs resolving. No answers to the questions, on a self-nomination no less, just makes it firm, IMHO. Ifnord 18:03, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
16. Oppose I need convincing. The nom doesn't provide any relevant information. --Jay(Reply) 18:31, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
17. Oppose Gizza^{Chat ©} 19:41, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Neutral

Comments

• Edit summary usage: 1% for major edits and 0% for minor edits. Based on the last 104 major and 0 minor edits in the article namespace. Mathbot 06:45, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• See Bormalagurski's edit count and contribution tree with Interiot's tool.
• Note to closing bureaucrat: Two of the first three users to support this nomination have less than 50 edits. JIP | Talk 10:06, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

This isn't true. I have 471 edits on en-wiki. --Jovanvb 10:55, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

I did not mean you, I meant the other two users. JIP | Talk 11:06, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Well, under 50 under this user name. But, that is not the question. Why did you bring that issue? --Manojlo 12:01, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Please write the other user names, so that can be fixed. Thanks in advance. feydey 12:48, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

• Can some bureaucrat apply WP:SNOW please? JoshuaZ 18:17, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.

A.

2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

A.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.