Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Agent 86
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not proceed - the nominee declined. Please do not modify it.
[edit] Agent 86
Final (0/0/0) Ended 21:26, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Agent 86 (talk • contribs) – Even though I have not been on Wikipedia for very long, I have found this user to be the most honorable person I have met. Though I opposed him on a bitterly fought AfD debate, he never ceased to see both sides of the argument. I think he would be a fine adimistrator Mikeeilbacher 16:57, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
Thank you for the nomination, I am flattered. However, I must respectfully decline the nomination at this time. I still feel pretty "new" around here and have not given enough serious consideration as whether or not I really want or need the tools. In any case, I think I need at least another month or two around here before I accept a nomination. For what it's worth, I don't recall any "bitter" AfD, but checking back in the contributions, I see which one my nominator is referring to. I hope no bitterness was perceived by Mikeeilbacher and apologise if I caused him/her any hard feelings. Agent 86 21:26, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
- Support
- Oppose
- Neutral
- Comments
- Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
- 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
- A:
- 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
- A:
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A:
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.
