Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations/Held nominations

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

This is a record of articles that were recently nominated for Wikipedia's Release Version, and were found to be of sufficient quality, but were found to fall outside the scope of the release version. Articles are listed in the category in which they were nominated, with the most recent entries at the bottom of each section. The reasons for an article's archival can be found on the article's talk page.

[edit] Prior nominations

  1. M. C. Escher (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) I haven't heard of him before, and his article does not say that he is very important. The article isn't very good either. Eyu100(t|fr|Version 1.0 Editorial Team) 17:28, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
As I stated on the talk page, its quality appears similar to many other articles already slated for the release version, and to question the relevance of Escher because you "have never heard of him" is shaky reasoning at best. I've asked for a different person to review the entry and provide useful commentary on improving the article if it is warranted for inclusion purposes. *Spark* 18:16, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
  1. Anger - POV/OR-maybe. Lincher 23:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  2. Arab League - Stub. Lincher 23:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  3. Board game - Stub ??. Lincher 23:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  4. Capital punishment - B, needs wikification. Lincher 23:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  5. Child - Stub. Lincher 23:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  6. Church - Stub. Lincher 23:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  7. Church (building) - Start. Lincher 23:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  8. Civil liberties - Stub, Bias. Lincher 23:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
  1. Beer pong (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) That such a topic could be intelligently analyzed and discussed so extensively is an impressive feat. I think this article is exceptional. --Raoul Duke 18:13, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
The topic is not important enough to be included this time. Walkerma 04:47, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
  1. Percy Henn (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) Definitely deserves an inclusion. Almost GA. Auroranorth (WikiDesk) 11:13, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
The topic is not important enough to be included this time. Walkerma 05:09, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../r/e/l/Wikipedia%7ERelease_Version_Nominations_Held_nominations_347a.html"