User talk:Reginhild
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] considering your posts public domain
You mentioned on Talk:6.5 Grendel that you consider all your wikipedia posts public domain. Unfortunately there is a disclaimer everytime you post that says "You agree to license your contributions under the GFDL." That is definitely not the same thing as public domain. You might want to be aware of that. ⇒ SWATJester Ready Aim Fire! 16:59, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, they'd be public domain on the forums. I'm just letting you know that if you were to recopy them onto wikipedia, they'd be subsequently subject to GFDL. ⇒ SWATJester Ready Aim Fire! 03:20, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks, response posted at your talk previously.Reginhild 16:28, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] References
Hey Reginhild, you might want to take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources, it's a guide on how to properly cite references for articles. To be listed in the references section, things don't need to be strictly online sources, and they can still be footnoted. You might find it particularly useful for the 6.5 Grendel, where it looks like the pages used refer to very specific claims that want to be footnoted. --Eyrian 18:57, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Your AMA Request
You made reference that the article was being accused as being a copyvio, and now the talk page says it has permission (link to OTRS). Do you still require advocacy then, or is everything good? -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 21:35, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Issue resolved, author of material had given permission in writing online and was surprised at copyvio accusations, noted on AMA request pageReginhild 16:30, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can
[edit] Regarding edits to 6.5 Grendel
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Reginhild! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bfreewebs\.com\/.+, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 14:33, 21 March 2007 (UTC)