User talk:Redlands597198

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia

Hello Redlands597198! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking Image:Wikisigbutton.png or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! JDtalk 12:03, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

[edit] Deleting Helter

Thanks for your effort in identifying useless articles that had better be deleted. It is appreciated. You might, however, want to read Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion, Wikipedia:Proposed deletion, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, which explain the standard ways of attracting administrator attention for such cases. Wikipedia:Deletion policy will also be a good read. Henning Makholm 12:58, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hollyoaks

Hello. Just thought I'd contact you as you seem to be one of the main editors of the Hollyoaks article. I recently wrote on the Hollyoaks Talk Page regarding the development of the article, I was wondering if you have any thoughts on it? Ben 01:17, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Great! We do not necessarily need to move to individual pages, Coronation Street, EastEnders and Emmerdale all have a comprehensive character list in its own article, most of the Hollyoaks character information could easily be moved to a similar article and remain 'as-is'. If you read WP:FICTION it states: 'Wikipedia articles on works of fiction should contain real-world context and sourced analysis, offering detail on a work's achievements, impact or historical significance, not solely a summary of that work's plot.' That is what we really need for Hollyoaks; context, analysis and impact. The biggest problem we may encounter is sourcing information from the early days of the programme, since even the Channel 4 Hollyoaks website seems to forget ths show's history. Any ideas? Ben 11:11, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
I'll do some rooting around and get back to you! Ben 12:11, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
I've had no luck. I looked at the 'Hollyoaks Companion' book yesterday on Amazon (I think) I guess it could be a useful investment, but it seemed more like a 'fun' book than useful content. It's a shame that there are minimal resources. Hmph! Ben 17:40, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 3

I'm pretty sure that the Pi record you added to the October 3 article fails to rank high overall among the global events featured in days of the year articles. Thoughts? Rklawton 04:26, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Maybe... Possibly... Probably.
You can go ahead and remove it. Thanks, mate. Redlands597198 04:29, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
No worries. Thanks for understanding. Rklawton 04:34, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Summaries

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

--Mel Etitis (Talk) 18:30, 12 March 2007 (UTC)