Talk:Red Eye (film)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Films, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to films and film characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | ||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
 |
This article, category, or template is part of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to horror film and fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. |
Contents |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS TO MOVE, per discussion below. -GTBacchus(talk) 20:05, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Requested move
Red Eye (film) → Red Eye (American film) – As Wikipedia being neutural, this page should moved to "Red Eye (American film)". there is an article for Korean film of the same name. 성혀니talk with mesee my work 14:27, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Survey
Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
- Oppose. This has nothing to do with neutrality; the American Red Eye was more successful and is more notable. The Korean article is nothing but a picture and a single sentence. It barely qualifies as a stub, because the one sentence of text simply restates the title. On the English language Wikipedia, when people link to Red Eye (film) they will most likely be expecting to get the English language film. A disambiguation note at the top of the page is sufficient. Kafziel 16:17, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose for same reasons. Peter O. (Talk) 20:33, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
Add any additional comments
According to IMDb, the English title of the Korean film is Redeye (all one word) - so perhaps that should be moved to Redeye (film) ? -- Beardo 03:16, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, IMDb lists 3 different films under slightly different titles: Red Eye, Redeu-ai, and Redeye. -GTBacchus(talk) 20:05, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit] Dead?
I don't believe Jackson died at the end of the movie. I thought that he was still breathing as the police arrived. -Hoekenheef 10:15, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Consequences?
If the assassination had worked out, the officials could have easily found out that Lisa authorized the room switching - she never mentions that line of thought though? (clem 22:12, 20 September 2005 (UTC))
- I think she was more concerned about the threat to her father. Anyway, she had no choice - if she had said no, he would have killed her, her father and come up with a different plan to kill the Director of Homeland Security. The only way she could stop him and save her father was to go along with his plan and then escape. Scott197827 15 December 2005.
- It's also odd that Keefe's security people didn't question her as to why or how she knew was what going to happen. Good film anyways.Steviedpeele 03:40, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Lacrosse?
It says that the picture of McAdams playing lacrosse is an obvious reference to Mean Girls. Is it just me, or it in fact not obvious in the least? I didn't get the reference.
