User talk:Reapor2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This user is a sockpuppet or a meatpuppet of MagicKirin as established by the user's edits, and has been blocked indefinitely.
See contribs — page moves — all logs — block log
This user talk page has been protected from editing to prevent this blocked user from using the {{unblock}} template to relay abusive messages to administrators or reposting it after having been denied an unblock by more than one admin. If you have come here to issue a new warning to this user, it means the block has expired. Please unprotect the page, ask an administrator to do so, or request unprotection here.


Contents

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello Reapor2! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You may also push the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! -- Kukini 20:25, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical

{ Censorship}

Because I raise unpopular points, an administrator has banned me without cause and deleted all my edits.

Help Me - Censorship

I have an administrator who is banning me against the rules of Wikipedia

Please go here WP:AN and follow procedure there. The18thDoctor 17:53, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Please explain more precisely. What "unpopular" points have you made, and for what reason did that sysop blocked you? Quoted from WP:AN: If you are blocked, please contact the blocking admin via email (navigate to their userpage and click "E-mail this user". AQu01rius (User • Talk) 17:57, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Also see your user page User:Reapor2, then click block log - there is clear information on why you have been blocked and how to appeal it there.The18thDoctor 17:58, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

18th Doctor the block log reason is not accurate. As you know only in Mathematics will we find truth.Reapor2 23:12, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm out of ideas then, I suggest you reinstate the helpme tag and hopefully someone with an understanding of the situation can help you. I'm just a lowly user with no priviliges and not much experience. The18thDoctor 01:44, 3 February 2007 (UTC)


This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.

Request reason: "The orginal block we illegitimate and broke the Wikipedia rules of discussion and blocking to give one side an advatage. I have checked the rules I should have not been blocked and the administators are required to give warnings first."

Decline reason: "Confirmed abusive sockpuppet. Creating a new account to dispute a block on another account is not permitted. -- Yamla 14:40, 3 February 2007 (UTC)"

This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.
I have corrected the template layout for this user; The18thDoctor 14:10, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Administrator Abuse

Yamla is not relaying the facts. The original block was done by an administator who took off and refused to discuss. The administators refused to discuss the bias block. The only reason I was blocked was for P.C reasons. I have every right to edit.Reapor2 14:57, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

This is irrelevant to this account. We have confirmed that this account was set up in violation of WP:SOCK and so was blocked appropriately. You discuss your original block on that user page (or on unblock-en-l), setting up multiple acocunts to bypass that block is a clear and deliberate violation and will not be tolerated. --Yamla 15:02, 3 February 2007 (UTC)


You and the other administrators are abusing your position. I've checked the administrator pages, you do not have the right to block me. I will continue to ignore the blocks as you have shown that you do not deserve your positions.Reapor2 15:08, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Removing sockpuppet tag

Do not remove the sockpuppetproven tag from this page. You are confirmed as an abusive sockpuppet as per WP:SOCK. If you remove it again, this page will be protected. --Yamla 15:00, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../r/e/a/User_talk%7EReapor2_0399.html"