User talk:Realg187

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Realg187, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  VegaDark 19:29, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Talk Pages

I likewise reverted your edit to Talk:List of characters in Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas. Talk pages are for discussing the ARTICLE and changes to the article, not discussing the subject in the manner of a fansite message board. There are plenty of those you can check out for the kind of discussion you're looking to undertake. Croctotheface 23:59, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
I was talking about the article...—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Realg187 (talkcontribs).
This is the text I removed:

Luv Cesar, hey holms, tenpenny is a [as carl says] B!t*h!!!! Anyways, U can actually get the Mad Dogg Albums, can u???? There are just posters right? Also Luv Ryder, since he's based on Eazy-E, sum1 should mention that in the article! RealG187 23:54, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

The only change you proposed to the article was that it should mention Ryder's resemblance to Eazy-E, which it does and already did at the time you made the post. The bulk of your text was a discussion of characters you like in the game and questions unrelated to the content of the article. I don't want to discourage you from sticking around and posting, but article talk pages are not the appropriate forum for what you were seeking to discuss. Croctotheface 11:09, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
i just wanna say that, and that im glad that was there cuz i didnt know that, well i thought he kinda looked like him, but I didnt know that was intentional..

[edit] Micro$oft

If you continue to change this redirect, in defiance of community consensus that it should point to Alternative political spelling, you're likely to find yourself on the wrong end of a block. -/- Warren 18:59, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

This article is a misuse of the redirect feature the artivcle doesnt explain what it is a redirect of, or what it means! Maybe ill goto uncyclopedia!
Oh wait it does say, it should redirect to here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative_political_spelling#.22.24.22_replacing_.22S.22.3B_.22.E2.82.AC.22_replacing_.22E.22

So users dont have to scroll down!

[edit] Warning

Please refrain from making incivil comments like you made at Talk:History of South Africa in the apartheid era. Thank you. -- P.B. Pilhet / Talk 17:37, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

ur one them racists?

[edit] Editing others' user pages

Please do not edit the user pages of other contributors without their approval or consent, as you did with User:Uncle G. It may be seen as vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please visit the sandbox. 04:26, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

I wanted to ask him. Or do I use user talk for that?

[edit] Your recent article talk page posts

Please do not make irrelevant, personal comments on article talk pages as you did here. This isn't a forum for you to vent your personal feelings about copyright—article talk page discussions should focus on improving the article's content. Postdlf 18:43, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

The where should I put, in the article?? RealG187 18:13, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
No, you shouldn't post your personal feelings anywhere on Wikipedia. This isn't a blog or message board. And please proofread your comments before you post them. Postdlf 18:16, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
If there is a page about it, it is natural to post.... PS It wasnt irrelevant!RealG187 18:17, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
What you personally think about copyright is irrelevant to Wikipedia. What part of "this isn't a blog or message board" do you not understand? Please read what Wikipedia is not. Postdlf 18:23, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
It was on n article about copyright! RealG187 20:32, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussions you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Paul Cyr 18:40, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

What? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Realg187 (talkcontribs).
Talk pages are for discussion on the article, not the article subject. They are not forums for your personal comments about the subject. You have been told this previously, and it has now reached the point of vandalism. If you continue doing this you will be blocked from editing. Paul Cyr 03:35, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:Ta82spot.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ta82spot.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:11, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GoMax

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article GoMax, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ejg930 16:38, 24 March 2007 (UTC)