Talk:Real Ultimate Power
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Votes for Deletion
This page was recently listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion. The outcome of that discussion was to keep the article. For an archive of the discussion, see Talk:Real Ultimate Power/Delete.
[edit] The Real Robert Hamburger
I was able to locate a 2002 NPR interview I heard about the site and its creator (I added it as a link at the bottom) and they do call him Robert Hamburger.
[edit] Clan advertising
I removed a sentence that in my opinion only served as advertisement for a CounterStrike Source clan. I take it such self advertising is not wanted? Mystman666 19:13, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] "Book Reviews" Section
Is this really necessary? It's all from different POV's, and it doesn't seem to add anything useful to the article. I'm thinking about simply removing that entire section: what do you think? -Unknown
- I fully agree. If someone wants a book review, they can find it on amazon; descriptions belong in encyclopedias, not review, and we already have an excellent description. I am taking action to remove the reviews section presently, and if anyone disagrees feel free to revert, but please justify your actions here. Shaggorama 12:35, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] The Real Ultimate Power book
Someone should write some more on the book. It has a more serious undertone than the website. --✈ James C. 08:28, 2005 Mar 1 (UTC)
[edit] Internet Phenom
If it's an Internet phenomenon, it needs to talk about the parodies in the article. I just created two last week and I think the parody has almost over taken the original in popularity. I won't edit here because I don't want to promote my own sites/views on Wikipedia. --JoeHenzi 16:08, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Might well be popular, but I've never seen it. Can you provide a link on the talk page? (Links to the Alexa ratings for the two sites would also be helpful.) --L33tminion | (talk) 01:50, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Removed sentence
- "It surprisingly is the 5,349 highest rated book, which is a relatively good accomplishment in itself."
"Surprisingly" and "relatively good accomplishment" is too subjective, not NPOV. This statistic is fine if it can be sourced, and if the article indicates by what criteria the book is ranked (is it the 5349th best selling book by that publisher? On Amazon? In the world? etc.) --L33tminion | (talk) 01:49, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
- That is almost certainly the Amazon rank. As of 01:35, 2 November 2005 (UTC), the novel is ranked 3775 on Amazon (yes, I know...) --Maru (talk) Contribs 01:35, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Deletion
Somebody wanted to DELETE this page?!!! The fact that there is an encyclopedia entry for 'real ultimate power' attests to the true awesomeness of wikipedia. And I am being totally serious here, not sarcastic. --Ericcjensen 05:36, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
- I hereby give you dominion over all totally sweet Wikipedia entries. Go forth and flip out on vandals! --maru (talk) contribs 06:25, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] When?
When was Real Ultimate Power first posted? I know it's been up for years, but this article doesn't say how many. -GTBacchus(talk) 06:01, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
-
- At least before the year 2000, couldn't tell you exactly though --BHC 08:19, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Adding a sentence
Is there any use to adding that the "no" link on the home page goes to Oprah's site?
Fucking A.86.13.202.173 19:38, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
