Talk:Razia Sultana

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject_India This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. (add comments)
This article is maintained by the Indian history workgroup.
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject India because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WP India}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WP India}} template, removing {{WP India}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

Is it meant to be Altamash or Iltutmish? Leo Africanus 13:19, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Again, a historical name never written in English by the individual himself. The original Turkish form, I guess, might be Iltutimish or something. But in South Asia, where this individual was the first independent Sultan and in where he he has historical significance, he is invariably referred in common parlance, as Altamash.iFaqeer | Talk to me! 20:46, Oct 29, 2004 (UTC)

So he probably pronounced his name Iltutmish ;-) Leo Africanus 23:04, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Wouldn't bet on his pronouncing it only one way—just like a Muslim in the US or UK would be okay with being addressed by two or three pronounciations of his name, I think there might have been several in his time, too. It might be illustrative to look up documentation from his time.iFaqeer | Talk to me! 00:03, Oct 30, 2004 (UTC)
In India he's called Iltutimish. deeptrivia (talk) 05:08, 26 January 2006 (UTC)


The article's subject is known is Razia Sultana. Females were not called Sultan, which is a male title, but by Sultana, with the a suffix added. I propose moving it to Razia Sultana. --Ragib 16:00, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

I agree - in Delhi, she's typically referred to as Razia Sultana. --WarrenA 10:07, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

The text looks like it was lifted entirely from here: http://www.storyofpakistan.com/person.asp?perid=P047 It needs to be rewritten to avoid plagerism. Also, can anyone give more info on her involvement in warfare? I'd like to add her to the Timeline of Women in Medieval warfare. Asarelah 17:46, 30 December 2006 (UTC)