User talk:Ray Oiler
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, Ray Oiler, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
- If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! Shimgray 19:54, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] DYK
 |
Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Todd Cameron Smith, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently-created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
[edit] LICRA v. Yahoo!
Thanks for your comment on the Appeal Court judgment. I am aware that the section I cite is not the only reason that the appeal was dismissed (three judges felt that the court had no jurisdiction over the French parties; three judges felt that the case was no longer ripe as the French parties had no intention of enforcing the French order and in any case Yahoo! had changed its policies to substantially comply). However, as the case was argued on First Amendment grounds, I think the courts observation as regards to the extent of First Amendment protection is relevant in general, even if it were not decisive in this case. Best wishes, Physchim62 (talk) 12:18, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Canadian election results
Since the CBC definition of "elected" is arbitrary (it does not mean that enough votes have been counted for a candidate to be elected), this should be avoided on Wikipedia. I am using data from the Elections Canada web site to update Wikipedia. Andrew_pmk | Talk 03:27, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
- I know. What I said is that CBC calls candidates "elected" even if it is possible (but unlikely) that another candidate could be elected. Andrew_pmk | Talk 03:33, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
