User talk:Ravenous
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] image
The image you added to Euphronios and Sarpedon was a good one. Any particular reason why you then removed it? Curious, Chick Bowen 21:13, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
- It's probably copywrite protected. Only 2d images are allowed as public domain, I wasn't thinking when I added it. I can contact the place I pulled it from and see if they'll give wikipedia permission, and if so I'll add it back. - Ravenous 21:19, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
- Ah, smart thinking--I wondered if copyright was the issue. The image is pretty low resolution, so a fair use claim should be possible--particularly since there's really no way to get a free image of a Euphronios work (now that the Louvre bans photography, as do most American museums). {{fairusein}} might be the best tag. Chick Bowen 21:27, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
- Hmmm... not a bad idea. - Ravenous 21:32, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
- Excellent--I just fiddled with the tags a little bit. By the way, since we claim it's low-res it probably should be lower than it is--I can't edit it now because I'm at a public computer, but I'll do so at home tonight. Looks good. Chick Bowen 22:09, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
- Hmmm... not a bad idea. - Ravenous 21:32, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
- Ah, smart thinking--I wondered if copyright was the issue. The image is pretty low resolution, so a fair use claim should be possible--particularly since there's really no way to get a free image of a Euphronios work (now that the Louvre bans photography, as do most American museums). {{fairusein}} might be the best tag. Chick Bowen 21:27, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Electra
Thanks for putting the name back in the link. Sorry I missed that. RupertMillard 00:54, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Poetics
Hi, you deleted books like "Aristotle in Hollywood" from Poetics [1] without giving a reason. Could you explain to me why you deleted them? I'm interested, thanks :-) Peter S. 22:52, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
- Most of the "External links" sections in these articles on classical works contain only links to translations - and I've been working on improving those lists. When I edited the one for Poetics, I must have missed that there was a non-translation item in the list (I should be more observant). Anyway, we can set up a new External links section and add it back if you want. If this is a book you've read, would you be interested in adding some info from it to the section "Influence of Work"? That section definately needs more. Then we can put it in a "References" section... Ravenous 23:38, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
-
- Yes, I read the book (good one btw). I'm not sure it should be mentioned in "Influence of the work", though, since "Aristotle in Hollywood" is not really a bestseller. I think it's one of the best introductions into the rather difficult Poetics, though. I might add some info about it at a later time, don't have much time right now. I just added a new section "References" and put the book inside - is that ok with you? Peter S. 00:46, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- Sure - that's fine with me. From the summary I read of the book, it may shed some insight into Aristotle's influence on modern day film. If that's the case, I think some info from it would be appropriate. Whether directly or indirectly, Poetics has influenced script-writing immensely. I believe I might have some other references on the shelf here that go into the subject, so I'll add to that section when I get a chance. Ravenous 02:04, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Actually, parts of the Poetics are lost, and this book tries to fill in the blanks, and creates a new Poetic theory. It then applies this to Film, TV and novels. I'd be glad to read your additions :-) Peter S. 15:29, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
-
-
[edit] Greek Theatre
Hi, I just read your note on the WikiProject Theatre discussion page. I have been looking over your contributions to Greek Theatre and just wanted to thank you for your work! It is marvelous. I had not even noted your additions to the template page. They are lovely! As I said in my response, I'm working on creating some smaller WikiProjects for specific areas of theatre. My current project is Elizabethan Theatre, but once I finish I think there should be one for Ancient Greek Theatre. I would be interested to have your input and again, thanks for your hard work! *Exeunt* Ganymead | Dialogue? 22:18, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks, glad I could be of some help. I'm looking forward to seeing an Ancient Greek Theatre project. I'll be compiling a list of things I think the play pages need help with. Let me know if you need any other assistance setting up the project. - Ravenous 00:00, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Protagoras
Thanks for catching my typo that made Protagoras minus two when he died... --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 21:17, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Aristophanes birds.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Aristophanes birds.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}
.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bibi Saint-Pol 16:53, 24 July 2006 (UTC)