Talk:Ravenloft (D&D module)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ravenloft (D&D module) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.
Article policies
WikiProject Dungeons & Dragons
This article is part of WikiProject Dungeons & Dragons, which collaborates on Dungeons & Dragons-related articles. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.
Good article GA
This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
High
This article has been rated as High-Importance on the importance scale.
Good articles Ravenloft (D&D module) has been listed as a good article under the good-article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do.
If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a review.
To-do list for Ravenloft (D&D module): edit  · history  · watch  · refresh


Here are some tasks you can do:
  • Copyedit: Continue working towards standard of "Well written" meaning that the prose is compelling, even brilliant.
  • Verify: Search for more reviews/discussions of items covered on this page (possibly there is one in White Dwarf or similar from the mid 80's.)
  • Expand:
    • Add more information to Expedition to Castle Ravenloft section. Particulary:
      • New encounter format.
      • What is expanded/changed from original.
    • Find more image(s). Possibly covers of those mentioned in "Reprints and New Versions".
    • Add more of critical views.
    • Could the article be made more "Comprehensive", meaning that the article does not neglect major facts and details.
Priority 6

Contents

[edit] Neverwinter Nights module

A Neverwinter Nights version of module http://nwn.bioware.com/players/modprofile_spires.html. Have put this link here as a placeholder for latter incorporation into the article. - Waza 23:12, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Now above has been included in article - Waza 21:38, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Encounter format for Expedition

Possibly encounter format derived from "Delve format" as per http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/dd/20060317a Need to look for a source to confirm this. - Waza 03:26, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Have searched but not found a source confirming this. If someone finds one latter it can be added to the article. - Waza 00:05, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Good Article Criteria

I have added this sectrion to make notes on how this article is going at meeting Good Article criteria. Please add to make comments about this here until it is ready for nomination - Waza 01:37, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Two items remain on the to do list, while both will help improve the article I do not believe they would be required to meed good article status (but probably would be if the article is pushed to featured article nomination in the future).
  • Expanding Expedition - expansion of this section would help make article comprehensive (a Featured article requirement) but even without an expansion coverage is still broad (Meeting requirement for Good Article)
  • Find more images - article already has image appropriately used and labeled. Will more images of different versions would be helpful, a lack of images does not in itself prevent an article from achieving Good Article status.
- Waza 01:46, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

I believe this article has now reached the standard to be considered a good article and am planning to soon nominate it for Good article status. Please comment/edit if you agree disagree. The first criteria it is (1) It is well written. is my biggest concern as I have been so close to this article is hard to see its flaw, any feedback is very much appreciated. I do believe firmly it (2) is factually accurate and verifiable, (3) broad in its coverage, (4) follows the neutral point of view policy, (5) stable and (6) contains images, where appopriate, to illustrate the topic. - Waza 11:11, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

I have now nominated as a good article. Please keep improving while we await nomination to be processed. - Waza 10:57, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GApassed

Some prose glitches and minor issues, but passable. No major issues with references. A criticism section may help, but overall fine. — Deckiller 12:52, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../r/a/v/Talk%7ERavenloft_%28D%26D_module%29_27f9.html"