User talk:Randroide/IgSo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  • Randroide (me)
  • New sources inserted into the article by Randroide (me): Sixty five sources in forty five edits See here the relevant diffs.
  • Sources deleted by Randroide (me): None.
  • Unsourced statements pasted into the article by Randroide (me): None

ABOUT Aftermath of the 11 March 2004 Madrid train bombings

The article was tagged as "unsourced" in August 2006 [2].
Southofwatford tagged the article as "total dispute" in September 2006 [3], with the purpose (his own words) of providing a light level of protection [4].
In January 2007 I, Randroide, tagged +50 unsourced blocks of text [5][6]
The subsequent discussion with Southofwatford is here: This is the place to see how far you can go with discussion and consensus with Southofwatford, even in a clear-cut issue as the deletion of unsourced text.
In February 2007 I, Randroide, hided the unsourced statements [7]
Southofwatford reintroduced the +50 blocks of unsourced text, thrice [8][9][10]
  • Unsourced statements pasted into the article by Randroide (me): None.

ABOUT UserIgor21

  • New sources inserted into 2004 Madrid train bombings by Igor21: One [11]
  • Sources deleted by Igor21: Fourteen [12]Ten sources deleted in a single edit
  • Personal attacks by Igor21 (non exhaustive list):
    • I am "mad" [13], I should be blocked forever [14], I have "paranoid threats" (!)[15], I am in a state "of mental confusion and fluctuating consciousness" (!?) [16], I am a simulator [17][18], I am part of a "very small group of right winged fanatics" [19], I am a simulator [20], I use "poisonous" (or "toxic" [21]) sources, and Igor21 has nothing to talk with me [22], I am a "fanatic conspirationist" [23]. I cheated Durova [24] and I am a "Filibuster" [25]
    • El Mundo (Spain) -the second general information newspaper in Spain- is a "vomiting source of nauseating lies" and "a libelous t**d" [26], not acceptable as a source [27][28][29][30][31]
  • Igor21´s positions on WP:NPOV:
"Open your eyes, Wales is objectivist and takes Rand´s crap as a coherent philosophy. It is sad, but revealing about where he finds his epistemological rubbish about his definition of NPOV" SPANISH
This is the Wikipedia´s foolishness. It is clear that some sources are more credible than others, but NPOV won't allow to remove lying sources and forces to publish them with the others. SPANISH