User talk:Ramananrv123

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).
Welcome!!!
Welcome!!!

Hello, Ramananrv123, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. I browsed through your edits and I must say you're doing very well. If you have any questions about Wikipedia anyway, don't hesitate to drop a note at my user page. Regards from Slovenia, -Missmarple 09:02, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Periyar

these comments need proof or evidence as they are libeelous and Wikipedia can be sued.Please provide Proof and add.


In the 1930s, EVR visited Germany. It is not clear what he learnt from Hitler's Germany, but it is certainly true that the Dravidar Kazhagam was patterned after the Nazi Party - its black-shirted storm troopers were prone to anti-Brahmin violence.[citation needed] Its conferences prominently displayed lewd caricatures of Brahmins - somewhat patterned after Julius Streicher's Der Sturmer.[citation needed] The speeches called for the elimination of Brahmins from Tamil Nadu, and the enslavement of Brahmin women. The speeches harkened back to an ancient Tamil glory, similar to Hitler's revival of ancient Germanic culture.[citation needed] The DK positioned Brahmins as the antithesis of Tamils and Brahmins as the enemies of the Tamil language (ignoring the significant contribution by Brahmins to Tamil literature from time immemorial.) Within a span of 20 years, the Brahmins of Tamil Nadu, who had been living there for more than 2000 years, were turned into alien immigrants by the DK's propaganda.[citation needed]


His speeches used foul language to attack Brahmins, a practice that is followed even today by his followers. He never made any attempt to distinguish between good or bad Brahmins. For him, all Brahmins were evil, and were to be exterminated. By changing the usage of the word 'Brahminism' (which meant rituals and religion of the Brahmins) to mean 'casteism', he absolved all other upper castes of any responsibility of casteism, and only put the blame on Brahmins.[citation needed] His followers plastered the state with anti-Brahmin messages - for example: "If you see a snake and a Brahmin, leave the snake alone and kill the Brahmin." "We will break the temple and set fire to the agraharam (Brahmin settlement)" "We will turn Brahmin women into public property".[citation needed] Many of these slogans can be seen in walls in Tamil Nadu even today. The population of Brahmins in Tamil Nadu, which was about 10% in the 1920s, is today less than 3% as a result of persecution by EVR and his followers.[citation needed]

[edit] Messages

If you want to discuss an article, please use its Talk page. To contact a specific Wikipedia editor, use his/her user talk page. For instance, to leave a message for Mattisse, go to User talk:Mattisse. I've moved the comments you left at "Your comments on Palakkad Fort" to User talk:Mattisse. Please don't create any more pages like that - they are not the appropriate way to communicate with other editors. FreplySpang 00:19, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

You didn't leave the note at Mattisse's talk page. Instead, you created a new page called Your comments on Palakkad Fort. I'm not quite sure how you came to make this mistake, but that's what you did. Regards, FreplySpang 00:30, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Message

Did you want to leave me a message about Palakkad Fort? If so, just click on this link User_talk:Mattisse, click on the button "Write a new note for Mattisse" and leave me a message. Is your concern the need for footnotes? I would be happy to help you put them in. Sincerely, --Mattisse 00:27, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Kashmir

If Azad Kashmir is a term given by Pakistan, then what India usually use a term for Indain held Kashmir, Indian occupied Kashmir, "an atoot ang" integeral part of India? Anyways Northern Areas and so-called Azad Kashmir (under your aspect) are two different regions, nevertheless if they had some geoghraphical relations in ancient times. Take care Friend. Haider 22:44, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

First of all, you have forgotten your sign at the end of your reply, it is just to press four time "(~~~~), it appears your name with date and time. For reply you, I had to go back to pashtun talk page! Coming back to our main discussion, you meant, a term given by Pakisntan is Azad Kashmir and by India "Atoot Ang", while it should be simply like Indian occupied Kashmir and Pakistan occupied Kashmir? Haider 23:13, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
What should we use a term for Indian occupied Kashmir, "Indian Administered Kashmir" rather than Just "Kashmir"? Haider 20:08, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
The problem is, reference books usually applying "terms" Pakistan occupied area as Azad Kashmir, even on Britannica, which I myself dont believe in them. Line of Control is another famous line(problem), anyways it should be solved as under the resolutions passed by the United Nations Haider 20:29, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Railways

I've removed some controversial material from the Indian Railways page. I've also left a message on that talk page in the hope that these users follow set guidelines. If they continue to do so, please revert and post a message on the talk page. If they continue, then you would need to notify some admins. Regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= 17:25, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi, in regards to that page. If you find something POV, then post a citation tag like this, {{Citation needed}} which will produce this [citation needed] on the page, at the end of the sentence of paragraph. Also, in regards to the two users who are edit warring as a team, it seems that Truevlaue was created on March 16, 2007. Also, this user has edited on the same pages here as Ramananrv123 here. Your best bet would be to do a WP:RCU or checkuser on both these accounts here. If both accounts are found to have the same IP Address, in most cases they would both be blocked. I hope this was helpful. Regards. Wiki Raja 00:42, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi, Sir, The issue of edit war in Indian Railways, Rajdhani Express and Shatabadi Express has been raised by some users as they think that posting an official version of Indian Rail will be a neutral point of view. If mentioning that Indian Rail needs heavy investment or it needs improvement to meet global standards becomes personal point of view, then this will not keep the Wikepedia's standard. Further, the fact that the Airlines are giving run for money to Rajdhani & Shatabadi by wooing its passengers is not a personal point of view, it is well known fact in today's India. Mentioning that Shatabadi & Rajdhani are very slow from Global standards of Fastest trains is a fact, when TGV runs at 320 kms/hr and Maglev train runs at a top speed of 431 kms/hour. Hence, my request to you is that please maintain neutrality in these Railway related articles, towing Railway's official line will not maintain Wikipedia's standards. (Truevalue 07:42, 19 March 2007 (UTC))

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../r/a/m/User_talk%7ERamananrv123_7f7d.html"