Talk:Rajesh Shah

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion recently. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is within the scope of the Homeopathy WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Homeopathy. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

Contents

[edit] Sources

The sources in this article are virtually all from http://www.askdrshah.com this is not an independant third-party source. MidgleyDJ 20:21, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

  • Comment: I would not agree with above statement, as some of the sources are third party sources.
  • Comment: I believe that the references such as Sify, Rediff, Khaleej times, Simillimum journal (USA), etc. are definitely third party sources hence the question of neutrality should not arise. Sunildp 10:27, 10 November 2006 (UTC) Dr. Sunil
I must respectfully disagree. References such as Sify & Limca may (see my last comments on the deletion discussion) indicate notabilty, I'm not in a position to say. They do not indicate neutrality in the article (see WP:NPOV). MidgleyDJ 10:35, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] World Record

Hi - The world record claim in the article says 122 countries. The subjects website (http://www.askdrshah.com/) suggests the number is 118. What is the correct number? MidgleyDJ 10:24, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Qualifications?

I'm assuming Dr. Shah has two degrees (a bachelor of medical science or equivalent) and some kind of homeopathy degree. If so, these should both be included in the article. The term "MD" is also confusing. Some people assume it's a medical degree ie: (a bachelor of medical science or equivalent) while others interpret it as a Ph.D. in medical research - Can one of the other editors elaborate on this? Thanks MidgleyDJ 10:28, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] References

Hi again, I was wondering if we should implement the referencing system using Footnotes. Currently the article has a list of references that arent listed in the article proper. These should probably be removed unless they are cited in the text. Thoughts? MidgleyDJ 10:32, 13 November 2006 (UTC)