User talk:Rainbowwarrior1977
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Rainbowwarrior1977 (talk · contribs · block log)
P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)
[edit] Your Accusations
In responce to the comments on my talk page: My message made no legal threat. I am sorry that you misinterpreted it. Warning someone that they might be breaking the law is not a threat. I never said that either Wikipedia or I would take any legal action against you; I only warned you for your benefit that many localities don't like behavior similar yours and it would be best to change your ways. Furthermore, you have clearly and willfully violated just about every bit of Wikipedia policy that there is to violate including personal attacks against me, so no administrator would take you seriously if you accused me (or anyone else) of a policy violation. -Casito⇝Talk 06:25, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Do not list another user's page for deletion
If you persist in marking Casito's page for deletion, you will be banned. Do not modify or remove this warning - I will monitor your behaviour and will remove it myself when I see fit. Manning 05:32, July 22, 2005 (UTC) (Administrator).
[edit] Thanks
Thanks for your words of encouragement - and for your work here! -- BD2412 talk 19:48, July 23, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] WP:RFA Warning
Please do not delist any pages from the WP:RFA page. I understand there is a dispute between you and other editors on that page, but that doesn't give you the right to remove a valid RFA out of spite. Linuxbeak | Talk | Desk 18:09, August 6, 2005 (UTC)
No, it means you're too new and have demonstrated you do not have a solid grasp on Wikipedia policies and guidelines. And, "my boy", I happen to have said authority you doubt I have. And, seeing you just relisted the RFA... again... I am going to extend said authority by blocking you for 30 minutes. Take this time to read Wikipedia:Disruption and Wikipedia:Assume good faith before you make a serious blunder. Linuxbeak | Talk | Desk 18:19, August 6, 2005 (UTC)
- Don't allow yourself to be intimidated by Alex; he's just a little anxious since Steven left. Oh, these faggots and their mood swings!
[edit] Following the rules
I suspect you know the rules already, so I'll just give you one last warning. You should not use the speedy delete template to request verification of facts. You could simply have googled Mark Bortz's name yourself.
http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/BortMa00.htm
If you will comply with policy, however, you are welcome to keep editing here. Uncle Ed 19:00, August 6, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Diplomacy
You really need to be more diplomatic. On the Fatherland talkpage, you refer to the article's original author (i.e: me) as a "troll". I've been reading your comments on other talk pages, and based on those, I do not believe you have the right to criticise my work on here. It is not only impolite and arrogant to brazenly insult people older and wiser than yourself, but it is also a very risky path to take if you wish to become an Administrator. I agree entirely with Linuxbeak's above comments, and seeing as he is an Administrator with the power to block you, I would seriously advise you to think carefully about what you write in future. Rusty2005 16:39, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Why Are You A Liar?
Sorry for being so forward but, really, why are you a liar? When you tried to get yourself elected an administrator, you lied about being a NYU graduate with a law degree, as well as lying about being married. More recently, on my friend Rusty2005's talk page, you made references to dating the daughter of a Cambridge professor "some time ago", something I find rather unlikely. If your user page is correct, you're a 15 year old Peruvian. So, which is a lie? Your age or all that other garbage? -Soltak 18:59, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
- Well done avoiding the question I posed. And you must forgive me if I fail to stand in awe of your lofty 101 edits. I would suggest that you read No Personal Attacks before again commenting out what you perceive as a lack of education on my part. I would suggest that you learn not only diplomacy, as was advised above, but also a bit of respect. If I'd acted like such a cheeky little twit as a 15 year old I would've earned quite a lesson from my father. But, back to the point, why are you a liar? I'd love an answer this time. -Soltak 19:17, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Request for Comment
Good evening. I wanted to let you know that a request for comment has been opened regarding your recent behavior. You can find the discussion here. Ryan 00:53, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
- I don't know how long you have. I know that we had to have at least two people who acknowledge that the RfC was necessary. Ryan 04:51, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Re:Pamstar
The issue is much greater then pamstar's ability to edit. I'm sure we can work some deal out eventually but first you have to reform your editing a bit. I suggest that you start by apologizing a little bit for your behaviour on the RfC and respond to my comment. I am not trying to force anything upon you here but I do believe you do need to fix some aspects of your wikiquette. Sasquatch↔讲↔看 05:46, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
- I have made an effort not to get you banned but it requires some sincerity on your part. See Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Rainbowwarrior1977#Final request by Sasquatch. Please sign if you agree to those terms. If not, you unfortuantly are at the will of the community at large. Sasquatch↔讲↔看 04:34, August 9, 2005 (UTC)
basically. I don't think they'll really mind the stuff about you dating larissa as there are more serious issues at hand. Sasquatch↔讲↔看 04:48, August 9, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Arbitration
Since you have demonstrated no intent to take the RfC seriously, I have filed a Request for Arbitration with the Arbitration Committee. This is notice to make a statement in your defense at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration. -- Essjay · Talk 12:28, August 9, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Request for Arbitration behaviour
Since a RfAr (Request for Arbitration) has been filed, it is basically the last chance you will get. I suggest that in your reponse 1) restate your apology about the abusive behaviour they have outlined, with the exception of dating Larissa, just ignore that to the best of your ability for now, it is really irrelevant 2) do not demand apoligies from other user but rather use a nicer tone 3) say you will, and do, reform your editing habits and 4) make some suggestions for compromise and show your willingness to help the project. That's all I can really say. I suppose I will try to help you reach a compromise but that will probably be the extent of my involvement in this. Remember, just be civil and, as the old adage goes, if your can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. If other choose to ignore that, ignore their statements. If you take everything in good stride I'm sure the Arbitration comittee will be more than happy to help. Sasquatch↔讲↔看 20:07, August 9, 2005 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if you are aware of this but you should probably respond here in defence. Please consider carefully what I have said above. Also, I noticed that you have apolgised to some users. Provide the diffs for those and show you willingness to change and I doubt this will have to escalate any further than it already has. Regards! =) Sasquatch↔讲↔看 23:56, August 10, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] RfC/ArbCom
I'm afraid my experience with RfC's and ArbCom is terribly limited. This is actually the first RfC I've ever stepped into - but I don't think the time frame is unusual. -- BD2412 talk 22:40, August 9, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy tagging
Hi, bands are not candidates for speedy deletion, notable or not. Please only use speedy tags on articles which meet the criteria. Kappa 09:25, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Last time
I've asked nicely, and now I'm asking one final time. Do not post to my talk page again. If you have comments to direct towards me, do it through the Arbitration Committee. If you continue, I will request a temporary injunction from the Arbitration Committee. -- Essjay · Talk 03:07, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks
I was not worried, but all the same it's nice to have it behind me. -- BD2412 talk 18:31, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Block
I have blocked you for two weeks, for your trolling and personal attacks and general dicketry. I would block indefinitely, but due to your arbcom case, that would be bad form. I hope you come back a bit better. Feel free to contest the block at this talk page, and to admins: I will not be offended if you unblock him, so don't be shy. But I may recommend to leave him blocked. Redwolf24 (talk) 03:30, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
- For more context, your edits range from Comment. Yes, you did step over the line. These decisions are not for you to make. And this nomination is in Good Faith. You know I am smarter than most of you.Rainbowwarrior1977 17:48, 6 August 2005 (UTC)! to saying you have a law degree when you're 15 to many other things. Watch me unilatterly indefinitely block you indefinitely, and I'll let the ArbCom case still run just to make the ban official. Redwolf24 (talk) 03:46, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
- I fully support Redwolf24's decision to indef. block this user pending a final arbcom decision. Jtkiefer T | @ | C ----- 03:55, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
- No objections from me. Zach (Sound Off) 07:32, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
- I support Redwolf24's actions. While an indefinite block is something I would rarely support, this case is a necessary exception. Ral315 WS 04:17, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
- I fully support this block. About time he learned a lesson. --Rusty2005 10:48, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
Can one of the block supporters please provide me with some diff links, I'm having a hard time figuring out where these personal attacks are... I'm not up with the history, so rather than spending my time searching, could one of you please provide? ... I asked redwolf24 but he only cited arbcom support? I'd just like some information so I can form my own view.--Gmaxwell 02:16, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Yup!
This is not really that big of a deal, seeing as how i've made two edits in the last month; but I would like to state for the record that this just doesn't seem "fair." What you did basically infriged upon the authority of the Arb-Com.Rainbowwarrior1977 03:08, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
[21:11] <Neutrality> I lend my official sanction to your actions. You can quote me on that.
Guess not. Redwolf24 (talk) 04:12, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
- If you've got a problem with this, RainbowWarrior, then tell the ArbCom. I'm sure they'll be fascinated reviewing your past record.--Rusty2005 13:49, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Email
Hey Rainbowwarrior, I'd like to chat with you offwiki but you don't have an email set. Please drop me a line. --Gmaxwell 02:34, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
Hello! Sorry it took so long to get back to you. My email is discoeldo79@yahoo.com if you want to send me a message. My real name is Frank. Feel free to drop me a line sometime! Rainbowwarrior1977 02:10, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
