Talk:Rainbows in mythology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Cleanup Taskforce article This article has been improved by the Cleanup Taskforce to conform with a higher standard of quality. Please see its Cleanup Taskforce page for more details on this process, and possible ideas on how you can further improve this article!

This article was nominated for AFD with a decision to keep. The discussion is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rainbow mythology.


I propose the removal of the word "inexplicability". Rainbows have been explicable for more than 300 years. TECannon 14:44, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

I agree, all mythologic mystery aside. Credit goes to Isaac Newton if I'm not mistaken.--Mashford 23:54, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
I think I put that word there and it probably isn't the word I wanted. Prior to Newton and modern optics it was, howeever, inexplicable. Ancient people looked at it and wondered (were awed). What's a good word for this behavior? RJFJR 03:33, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

Proposition no. 2: to remove the Cleanup tag. All seems adequately written, covers all different traditions, etc. Any objections? --Mashford 23:54, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

There were some comments about cleanup during the AFD (here). Have they been addressed? RJFJR 03:33, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
I'm not convinced, still too much flowery stuff like "our species' earliest rainbow is the rainbow of the imagination" -- tasty prose, but not encyclopedic in tone, or content. So how much deletion will not result in howls from other editors, I wonder. But if somebody else wants to take responsibility for declaring this article good, by all means. I didn't intend to adopt it, I was only trying to help out w/ cleanup! :) Eaglizard 03:38, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
As per AFD consensus moved to article from Rainbow mythology to Rainbows in mythology --Vyzasatya 07:34, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Odd sounding

This article sounds pseudopsychological, and strays away from the point. It sounds weird, like something not from an encyclopedia but from a convincing book on rainbows. Odd. --Justaperson117 09:47, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] cleanup

  • Sorted everything into respective mythologies (AFD consensus) and reorganized into diff sections. Cleaned up most of the article except first section which needs to be rewritten/reorganized to be in flow with the rest of the article.--Vyzasatya 08:11, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
  • firly in good shape to go out of cleanup desk --Vyzasatya 23:54, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Just corrected areas referring to "God never again destroying the world"... adding the clarification that the symbolized promise was to never again destroy by flood. (Gen 11:9)


Wow, I'd forgotten all about this article. It really looks good now, great work! Eaglizard 11:58, 17 July 2006 (UTC)