User talk:RaGnaRoK SepHír0tH

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This user talk page has been protected from editing to prevent RaGnaRoK SepHír0tH (talk • contribs • block logauto) from introducing vandalism to it, posting abuse and nonsense or using the {{unblock}} template after the denial of a previous request . If you have come here to issue a new warning to this user, it means the block has expired. Please unprotect the page, ask an administrator to do so, or request unprotection here. (protection log).

Request to unblock

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.

Request reason: "Please cite the policy on why I was blocked."

Decline reason: "see WP:VAND and if they had not blocked you I would under WP:USERNAME -- Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 19:55, 1 November 2006 (UTC)"

This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.
Betacommand, could you cite which of my edits are considered vandalism? I was blocked indefinately before I was even given a warning. I have been making many productive edits on this account and on my old account which I no longer use because I can no longer access it. Note that my old account (User:RevolverOcelotX was never indefinately blocked before yet my current account is now indefinately blocked. I wish for this account to be unblocked as this will be my primary account. User:Dmcdevit has unfairly indefinately blocked my account and accused me of being a "troll" without any evidence. Dmcdevit blocked my account because just because I had multiple accounts, however according to Wikipedia:Sock puppetry , multiple accounts are allowed provided that the streams do not cross. I would like to get the opinion of other admins on this and post this on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard to review this unfair block. This indefinate block is clearly unjustified. Please assume good faith and unblock this unjustified block. And if my username was inappropriate, I will request to change it. Thanks. --RaGnaRoK SepHír0tH 05:50, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but an administrator or other user has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators or users can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request nor add another unblock request.

Request reason: "What was the reason for blocking my account?"

Decline reason: "See dmcdevit's response below -- Tawker 06:18, 1 November 2006 (UTC)"

This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.

User:Dmcdevit, I would like to know the reason and the policy behind why my account was blocked. I thought users were allowed to make new accounts just as long as they don't violate the official policy with the account? I haven't violated any policy in tandem with this account or together with any other accounts. In fact, I quit using those other accounts all together. This seems like an unfair and unjustified block. Please state your reason and cite the policy for the blocking of my account.

Heres what an admin had to say about sockpuppet, "According to the official policy, "sockpuppetry in itself, while discouraged, is permitted provided that the streams don't cross." at this checkuser. I've seen many cases where users had more than one account but they were not blocked, provided the streams don't cross. Please unblock my accounts. Thanks. --RaGnaRoK SepHír0tH 06:03, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Surprisingly enough, people who, within one day of editing, engage in stalking and massive edit wars across many pages without productive edits, and are merely reincarnations of earlier problem users, aren't welcome here. Maybe I could have been more accurate in my block log, but I think you are a troll, and I don't use that word lightly. Dmcdevit·t 06:11, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
I'm surprised at the amount of bad faith and hypocrisy here. Have you seen any of Certified.Gangsta's edits? He has been mass reverting all of my contributions without any reason and mass POV-pushing in China/Taiwan articles (other users have complained about this). Certified.Gangsta (talk • contribs) who was formerly Bonafide.hustla (talk • contribs) and Freestyle.king (talk • contribs) before he changed his username twice was blocked many times (see previous block logs), is also engage in stalking and massive edit wars across many pages, yet you did not block him. This seems like an abuse of administrator powers and helping Certified.Gangsta gain leverage in many content disputes. Please cite the official policy on why I was blocked.
Certified.Gangsta's has also continually deleted my comments on other user's talk pages here and here. Other users have also complained about Certified.Gangsta's behavior (see above and see his contributions and talk page history).
The reason I made a new username was because I can't access my RevolverOcelotX account anymore and I don't plan on using that account in the future. I'm also surprised that you said I said that I haven't made productive edits. I was making MANY productive edits before Certified.Gangsta came and mass reverted all of my legitimate edits without giving any reason. This is harassment and stalking from Certified.Gangsta which is due to his personal vendetta. On my old accounts, I was also making MANY productive edits. There is no evidence of policy violation here and this block is definately unjustified. I would like to ask you to get the opinion of other admins and the community and unblock this account. Thanks. --RaGnaRoK SepHír0tH 06:35, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

RevolverOcelotX is not banned or blocked. Why don't you stick with your old account?--Jiang 06:56, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Quoting above: "because I can't access my RevolverOcelotX account anymore" -- enochlau (talk) 06:58, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, I can't access my old account anymore. So I can only edit with this account. --RaGnaRoK SepHír0tH 07:13, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Last edit before I begin my 1 week "self-imposed" exile. If this user really lost his p/w then he should've made it clear on his userpage that this is an alternate account of RevolverOcelotX instead of trying to create a new identity.--Certified.Gangsta 07:03, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Nothing in the policy requires you to state that. Different accounts is permitted provided that the streams don't cross. --RaGnaRoK SepHír0tH 07:13, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../r/a/g/User_talk%7ERaGnaRoK_SepH%C3%ADr0tH_be6a.html"