User talk:R Pollack

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] New Lanark

Please do not revert good faith edits without comment (as you did here). Thanks/wangi 23:27, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. . Again - do not revert good faith edits without comment. Thanks/wangi 11:44, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Additionally please consider WP:OWN. Thanks/wangi 11:45, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unacceptable edit summaries

Whatever the merits of the content of the article, using edit summaries to abuse or dismiss other editors is unacceptable [1]. Edit summaries should summarise edits and nothing more. Continue in this vein and you will be blocked from editing wikipedia. Please review WP:AGF, and WP:NPA, and conduct yourself with more civility in future. Thanks. --Doc 14:14, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Who are you? Why are you issuing threats? What do you mean by abuse or dismiss? Please explain yourself? Why are you preventing me from correcting vandalism? Are you acquainted with Wangi and are you acting on his behalf? R Pollack

I'm an administrator - and I'm giving you fair warning that your behaviour is unacceptable, and lightly to get you blocked from this site. The edits you removed were not vandalism - and while you are entitled to change pages, you are not entitled to abuse other editors or accuse them of being 'malicious'. If somone reverts your edits on wikipedia - talk to them in a civil manner and discuss. If you can't agree - wait for a third party to comment. I've nothing to do with Wangi, and I've no oppinion on your edits, but you cannot continue in this tone.--Doc 22:06, 4 September 2006 (UTC)