Talk:R.E.M. (band)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the R.E.M. (band) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.

Article policies
Peer review R.E.M. (band) has had a peer review by Wikipedia editors which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ]
(If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to musicians and musical groups on Wikipedia.
This article is part of WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state), an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Georgia (U.S. state) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.
This article is part of the Rock music WikiProject, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage of articles relating to rock music, and who are involved in developing and proposing standards for their content, presentation and other aspects.
If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Kim Gordon and Thurston Moore of Sonic Youth This article is part of the Alternative music WikiProject, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage of articles relating to Alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the Project's quality scale.
Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the Project's importance scale.
Former FA This article is a former featured article candidate. Please view its sub-page to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Archived talk pages: 1 | 2


Contents

[edit] A note on GA status

I see that this article was at one time a Featured article or FA candidate. However, the article is not listed as a Good Article . As part of the Rock music WikiProject, it is suggested that an article achieve Good Article (GA) status before having it's candidacy re-newed. So be sure that points from any previous Features article candidate (FAC) archives and peer reviews are taken and applied to the article, and shoot for a GA nomination. Good luck! --Reaper X 22:37, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was NO CONSENSUS to move page, per discussion below. -GTBacchus(talk) 01:03, 19 March 2007 (UTC)


I suggest to move this page to R.E.M. not only because R.E.M. already redirects to R.E.M. (band) but also because R.E.M. with periods between the letters seems to refer to the band only, while REM without periods seems to be the usual abbreviation for Rapid Eye Movement. The only other article titled R.E.M. with periods, R.E.M. a record by a Chicago-based band Green, is according to me less notable (the members named their album R.E.M. because of R.E.M. album Green). Your comments are welcomed, please write them below. Thanks. Frédérick Lacasse (talk contribs) 20:51, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Survey

Add "# Support" or "# Oppose" on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~. Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.

[edit] Survey - in support of the move

  1. Support. See P.O.D. Not confusing at all. The periods disambiguate it from "REM" fine. After the flip, there'd be some double redirects to fix, but not that many relatively speaking. Crumbsucker 06:20, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
  2. Support. The requested page name R.E.M. is just a redirect back to R.E.M. (band) anyway, so it's an unnecessary disambiguation. I've seen many move requests like this added to the Uncontroversial proposals list and performed straight away with no discussion, all the proposer is requesting is that the redirect be swapped around. Saikokira 06:06, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Survey - in opposition to the move

  1. Oppose, there's no need to tinker with this, it is fine as is, and it may just create confusion for new users down the road. --Reaper X 21:13, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
  2. Oppose. Don't make more work for yourself - it's likely to be a waste of time, because That's How Wikipedia Works™. - Dudesleeper · Talk 21:33, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
  3. Oppose. There's no overriding reason to move the article. I would readily argue that R.E.M. should point to disambiguation, not to this article. (I think REM should point to disambiguation as well.) -- ChrisB 01:20, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
  4. Oppose. It's just fine the way it is. --Guinnog 19:36, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
  5. Oppose. The other articles, particularly on REM sleep and its association with dreaming, are at least as important in the context of an encyclopedia. I would actually agree w/ ChrisB that both "REM" and "R.E.M." should point to disambiguation. --Turangalila (talk) 22:40, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Discussion

Add any additional comments

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.