User talk:Qwe
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Welcome
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- How to edit a page; Editing tutorial; Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article; Naming conventions; Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!
Whosyourjudas (talk) 02:08, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
[edit] United 93 reviews
Regarding the review links on United 93 (film): I just checked the article again and I don't see any other reviews, just commentary pieces. I could be wrong. If there are any other actual reviews, they should be removed too. -- MisterHand 15:53, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks a lot!
for reverting the vandalism to my userpage. Regards, --Alphachimp talk 04:00, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- My pleasure :) qwe 05:33, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Cleanup Template
My bot, User:Alphachimpbot has just modified some of your cleanup templates. I just figured I would tell you... {{Cleanup|MONTH YEAR}} is not a valid template. Use {{Cleanup-date|MONTH YEAR}}. Just figured that I would tell you. I really do appreciate the work you do. --Alphachimp talk 16:43, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
- No problem, I wasn't aware of the cleanup-date template. I'll keep that in mind when tagging articles. cheers, qwe 20:45, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks for reverting the Vandalism.
I owe ya one. Sir Crazyswordsman 02:34, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Miniclip
Hi, please read the notes at Miniclip to see how Nagle has been proven wrong on many points and continues to post wrong information and continues to vandalise. See the history as a moderator fixed many of Nagle's mistakes then Nagle again inserted inaccurate information. Including saying there is "Hostile" code when none of his sources use the word hostile. Please look at updated information from his source which says the opposite. Nagle's source says the code is "safe" and "good" http://fileinfo.prevx.com/adware/qq317624173792-MINI40800/MINICLIPGAMELOADER%5B1%5D.DLL.html not "hostile" which is totally innacurate.
In light of this fact I suggest that his innacurate article be removed. Wiki is for facts not Nagle's opinion. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.7.30.154 (talk • contribs) .
Qwe, you should read the discussion notes before you rvv so you understand that no source ever said there is "hostile" code. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.7.30.154 (talk • contribs) 06:32, 27 August 2006.
[edit] 59.144.72.11
Seems 59.144.72.11 is back to vandalizing the award pages —The preceding unsigned comment was added by OverlordQ (talk • contribs) 05:28, 9 February 2007 (UTC).
[edit] No problem,
I realized this and actually deleted my comments, I am trying to get use to the editing part although I have used Wikipedia often. I was astonished at the comments being made on the Daniel Smith site. Some people are really frightening.
Keep up your good work and I hope to be out there helping : )(Sc17657 07:18, 9 February 2007 (UTC))
[edit] David Grohl
I don't think the addition I made to Dave Grohl's page was vandalism. Any fan of Grohl or Tenacious D would have recognized the reference immediately. David Grohl acted as the Devil in the D's movie and what I wrote was a quote. I think you should put back what I added. It was funny, and I think Grohl would agree. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 137.99.178.106 (talk • contribs).
It may not have been vandalism, but remember that Wikipedia is here to offer an unbiased view of all events, and shouldn't be funny just to amuse. any humor should prove a point, which I think your edit was lacking. .ιΙ Inhuman14 Ιι.( talk | contrib) 23:32, 9 February 2007 (UTC)