Talk:Pythia/Comments

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

   1. Well written?: Good mechanics. Very few errors in spelling/grammar. Good transition between paragraphs and sentences.
   2. Factually accurate?: The article is factually accurate based on the references shown.
   3. Broad in coverage?: The article is significantly thorough.
   4. Neutral point of view?: The biases expressed in the sources are all expressed in the article.
   5. Article stability?: Stability evident.
   6. Images?: The article contains one relevant image. This is good enough for now.

The article "Pythia" is a well-written and well-sourced article. Though the article needs a few more citations, its comprehensive content and lengthy coverage of historical and scientific perspectives grants it the rank of A-class. Deucalionite 16:08, 14 March 2007 (UTC)