Talk:Punjab insurgency
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Effect of Operation Bluestar
I've changed the text to read "The New Delhi Police were ineffective in stopping the rioters". Saying "did little to stop" implies that they chose to do little. Saying "could do little to stop" implies they wanted to stop, but did not have the resources. My version does not imply either, but only that they did not stop the rioting. I think that's far better, unless you can cite references one way or the other. (PS, I have no stake in this discussion other than noticing a minor revert 'altercation' going on :) ) -- Ch'marr 02:14, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
Sikh Conflict is very controversial in India. It depends from which angle are you seeing it. You can't form a conclusion on a conflict that is more than 50 years old by writting a small article. Especially when India is being accused by Human Rights Groups of mass scale killings/cremations/fake encounter/false flag operations during that era. The article buys the explanation from an Opressor and not from the victims. There is no wrong in presenting the controversial Indian side but presence of opinion of the other sides is crucial for the enumeration of the conflict. --- HSingh30 00:58, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
- Calling someone an oppressor is not exactly a neutral point of view --- Skapur 23:07, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
How would you justify opression and still call it "neutral"? Isn't mass cremation of Sikh youth oppression? It is a Gendercide. Your tacitc is to assert the opposite by use of misinformed debate, and is nothing short of fictious propaganda aimed at denial of human values to a group that suffered.
Categories: WikiProject Indian politics articles | Unassessed Indian politics articles | Unknown-importance Indian politics articles | WikiProject Indian history articles | Unassessed Indian history articles | Unknown-importance Indian history articles | Unassessed India articles | Unassessed India articles of unknown-importance | Unknown-importance India articles