Talk:Punisher computer and video games

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.	CVG Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
CVG To-do: edit  Gaming Collaboration of the week: Imagic Expand: New CVG Articles, Normality, Pac-Man World 2, Operation Flashpoint: Elite, Call of Juarez, Galactic Civilizations II: Dark Avatar, Ford Street Racing, Betrayal at Krondor CVG Peer Review: List of F-Zero titles, Kya: Dark Lineage, Wii Remote, Dynasty Warriors 4, The Sims 2, The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past, Kirby's Dream Land, Electronic sports, Fire Emblem, Dante (Devil May Cry), The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion, Final Fantasy XII, Sonic the Hedgehog (16-bit), Classes in World of Warcraft Cleanup: Age of Mythology, Mario Kart: Double Dash!!, Betrayal at Krondor, List of Nintendo trademarks Merge: Deletions / Essential articles / Magazines Assess and Prioritise articles (Log)

[edit] Move

I'm moving the information on the 2005 Punisher game to its own page, so that this page may deal with Punisher games in general. the new page is The Punisher (2005 video game)(Animedude 20:21, 28 October 2006 (UTC))

[edit] Another move=

I am moving this page in it's entirety to Punisher computer and video games to better follow the naming convention of Spider-Man computer and video games and Batman computer and video games (Animedude 20:38, 28 October 2006 (UTC))

[edit] Sup guys

Some of my comments, so you can think about it:

• 1. If there's an article about Fight Club, you don't talk about Fight Club.
• 2. If there's no article about Fight Club, you talk about Fight Club.
• 3. Apply to the article.
• 4. ???
• 5. PROFIT!

No, seriously.

The 1993 game has it's article (like the 2005 one), and the 1990 ones don't (and probably won't, as little known and forgetten). That's why you should have, for example, "Categories: 1990 video games", instead of (oncer again) "Categories: 1993 arcade games". And so on. (And where did you find anything 1994, I have just no idea - there's no 1994 even in the article.) Discuss or die. --HanzoHattori 20:55, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

now youre talking, its better this way if you dont call names, its uncivil, afterall, were both educated here right? in regard to the subject, yes, you/we can keep the The Punisher (arcade game), but bear in mind that a stub should be placed beneath the subject to indicate that if there's anyone out there who can expand the articel or know more anything about it, then he/she can do so, but if none, a merge template is placed above the article to indicate anyone can decide if it should be merged. now the problem here is when i viewed the Punisher computer and video games particularly the arcade/video section, it has the same "little content" as the The Punisher (arcade game), therefore, we cant just provide separate articles when theres a possibility of merging them. plus when a merge template is placed in an article, it opens an opportunity for civilized discussion to reach a consensus. what you just did of removing the template is article monopoly, you dont get to decide on your own, ask for people's opinions, we both dont want to end up being blocked on this useless editwar †Bloodpack† 21:09, 31 October 2006 (UTC)