Talk:Punctuation (chess)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Reordering

I reordered the symbols into symbols of increasing effectiveness of a move to make more sense. --70.111.224.85 13:30, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Symbols

Some of the symbols can be a single character, for example ‼. ςפקιДИτς 15:18, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit]  !! Brilliant move

This has been added to "!! Brilliant move" or the start of a forced checkmate. I'm not familiar with this. Can a reference be provided? If not, I think it should be removed (unless the consensus is to keep it). Bubba73 (talk), 21:05, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

I've decided to remove that, for now at least. In 39 years of reading chess books, I've never seen "!!" used that way. If there is a citation for that, it should go back in. Bubba73 (talk), 00:04, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
Image:chess_zhor_26.png
Image:chess_zver_26.png
a8 b8 c8 d8 e8 f8 g8 h8
a7 b7 c7 d7 e7 f7 g7 h7
a6 b6 c6 d6 e6 f6 g6 h6
a5 b5 c5 d5 e5 f5 g5 h5
a4 b4 c4 d4 e4 f4 g4 h4
a3 b3 c3 d3 e3 f3 g3 h3
a2 b2 c2 d2 e2 f2 g2 h2
a1 b1 c1 d1 e1 f1 g1 h1
Image:chess_zver_26.png
Image:chess_zhor_26.png
Does Rd8+ deserve a "!!"

I agree with the removal. In a position like in the diagram, I would not give a "!!" for Rd8+, nor do I think any annotator would. (I would probably give a "??" for any other move, and perhaps some more question marks for Rc1.) Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:25, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Exactly. I don't think that any move that leads to checkmate should get a !!, only a brilliant one. Bubba73 (talk), 15:32, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit]  ? - poor move, mistake, bad move ..

A discussion came up recently about the use of a single question mark and what that signifies in English. There seems to be a lot of ambiguity about this.

  • Oxford Companion to chess - weak move
  • Nunn's Chess Openings - bad move
  • Batsford Modern Chess Openings - bad or speculative move
  • Scid database software (last official release, version 3.6.1) - poor move
  • Play winning Chess by Yasser Seirawan - poor move
  • Logical Chess: Move by Move, Irving Chernev - a mistake.
  • The Mammoth Book of Chess by Graham Burgess - bad move

Perhaps the main article should mention the various wordings that are attached to '?'. Drkirkby 04:31, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

I am not sure those different definitions for "?" are really in disagreement. To me "bad move", "weak move", and "mistake" are all pretty synonymous terms. Compare that to "!?" where the definitions "interesting move", "risky move", and "enterprising move" have different meanings. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:08, 9 January 2007 (UTC)