User talk:Psyphics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Before launching an angry tirade about how you did not approve of my edit to a comic-related article, please consult the following guidelines and policies of Wikipedia I tried to follow in making it:

Contents

[edit] Archives

User talk:Psyphics/Archive 1

To make discussions easier to follow, I tend to answer any posts here. If you wish to get a notification, just tell me to post my response on your talk page.

[edit] Ultimate Tarantula

You brought the Ultimate Tarantula problem on the Tarantula (Marvel Comics) to our attention at the comics project talk page, so I thought you'd like to know someone is re-adding that unsourced speculation repeatedly now. The page could use more frequent monitoring. Doczilla 05:31, 26 December 2006 (UTC) It's getting worse. The editor with no username and whose IP address keeps changing is getting more aggressive about inserting speculative remarks into a number of articles. Doczilla 22:04, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Louisville growing and changing

WikiProject Louisville is sprouting its wings for 2007! We have a new Assessment Department and a much more refined project template. We have nearly 1,000 articles catalogued for our project. And we still have a lot of work to do. We have 500+ articles left to assess for quality, and all our articles, as always, need tender loving care. Please consider dropping by the project and seeing what you might be able to do to move Louisville-related articles forward. Cheers, and Happy New Year! Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 01:19, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Font Size

Thank you for contacting me. What I have been doing is typing in Microsoft Word and then doing a copy/paste into the Edit section of my article. After one copy/paste, I saved the changes and the fonts started to get smaller. I do not know what to do to correct this. Maple Leaf 21:53, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Krune.

I posted this on Krune's Talk Page.

I still did not actually call him a troll. I simply said that "I should have realized he was a troll." I did not say "Krune is a troll and should be blocked." Also, I thought the situation would be over after that edit. It seems, however, that's not the case.

Seriously, I didn't call him a troll. I realized my mistake with this User, and attempted to leave him alone, as ChrisGriswold said to do that. I said he left trolling messages, I still did not call him a troll. Acalamari 22:11, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

I understand and almost posted to that effect. It was implicit, and unintentional, but is understood. If I said something like "I should have realized you were a loser", you would think I called you a loser, no? Maybe I didn't, but I sure made it sound like I did. Regardless, I shouldn't have even posted what I did. It's almost like I was looking for an argument, which I wasn't. No worries. --PsyphicsΨΦ 22:57, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
That's fine then. To be honest, I didn't expect to be in the situation I am now. I thought it was all over when I posted that message to ChrisGriswold. Acalamari 23:43, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
It's okay, like I said, no worries. I shouldn't have called you out on it. Happy editing! --PsyphicsΨΦ 00:17, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Damian Tryp

So, how about trying to work on the article, instead of automatically tagging it for deletion. It seems that you bring up all these issues, but you don't have any way to fix it yourself. As a fan of the series, I'd think you would attempt to rectify the problem with edits, not deleation. (RossF18 03:35, 7 February 2007 (UTC))

Please assume good faith, but do not assume that just because I am a fan of the series, I'm going to want every character in the series to have its own article. Wikipedia is not a fanzine, it's an encyclopedia, and there are many wikis out there for this sort of information to be added. The reason I prodded it is because the article has all those issues and I don't believe they can be fixed (no secondary sources), thus the article should be deleted. As there are no sources, it is on you, as the one arguing to keep it, to fix the article or prove it's an exception. A prod is a very low-level deletion request, able to be circumvented by removing the prod from the article, its real purpose is to spark discussion. The edits I wish to make would merge it with a list of characters from X-Factor Investigations. --PsyphicsΨΦ 13:53, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ultimate X-Men (story arcs): Peer Review

Greetings! In October of 2006, you participated in the discussion for the first deletion nomination of Ultimate X-Men (story arcs). The article underwent a second deletion nomination, which was followed by two months of rewriting, reorganizing, and referencing. It is now undergoing a WikiProject Comics peer review. Your editorial opinion would be most welcome to help us improve the article to A-class status. Thanks for your time! - fmmarianicolon | Talk 07:00, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../p/s/y/User_talk%7EPsyphics_6867.html"