User talk:Psychonaut

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archives 2004-01-11 through 2005-11-09 2005-11-09 through 2006-09-24 2006-09-24 through 2006-12-13 2006-12-13 through 2007-03-23

Contents 1 proposed edit to Section 2.4 of the Srebrenica Massacre article 2 Mechanical watch 3 RFA Thanks 4 Srebrenica

[edit] proposed edit to Section 2.4 of the Srebrenica Massacre article

Psychonaut,

I just posted the following on the Srebrenica Massacre discussion page and am now, as a courtesy, posting this on the talk pages of frequent editors of the article. Best Regards, Fairview360 02:02, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Dear editors,

Please visit this version of the Srebrenica Massacre article to see the proposed changes to section 2.4: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Srebrenica_massacre&oldid=117151359

Please visit this site to see the proposed sub-article which the proposed section 2.4 text will be linked to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_executions_in_the_Srebrenica_massacre

If there is no major objection, we would like to introduce this major edit to the article this Sunday March 25. This ought to give each editor the time they need to review the proposed changes before they are fully introduced.

The objective here is to make the article more concise while continuing to clearly state what happened and in no way obscure actual events.

A full review of the proposed changes to section 2.4 and the sub-article will show that all information regarding the executions has been preserved and presented in a clear manner.

Thank you for your time and consideration. Fairview360 01:28, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mechanical watch

Hi Psychonaut, I've removed your uncat tag on this article, because I've placed it in about five or so categories. I also moved the page to the above title to fit the house style. It's a decent article; I'm proud of Steven for creating it, I knew he could do well here. Thanks for your input, --Tractorkingsfan 19:43, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

The problem, of course, is sourcing. I've told him as much, and I believe he'll be able to add adequate references. Thanks, --Tractorkingsfan 20:11, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] RFA Thanks

I would like to thank you for your support in my recent RFA. As you may or may not be aware, it passed with approximately 99% support. I ensure you that I will use the tools well, and if I ever disappoint you, I am open to recall. If you ever need anything, don't hesitate to leave me a note on my talkpage. Thanks again, ^demon^{[omg plz]} 20:42, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Srebrenica

I have several reports from UN and other news organizations about the Srebrenica massacre. I noticed that there is quite a bit of argument over the content of that article, so I would like to know if it is reasonable to add the quotes to this article (with appropriate links) knowing that they will not be erased the very next second? Thank you,

--Westtruth 02:37, 26 March 2007 (UTC)Westtruth

There's no guarantee that even the most apparently innocuous change to that article will not result in an uproar from various editors accusing you of trying to force a biased point of view onto the article. —Psychonaut 02:48, 26 March 2007 (UTC)