User talk:PSRuckman
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Great News
There may be some degree of rigor coming this way:
- http://www.tech2.com/india/news/internet/wikipedia-t-check-users-credentials/4666/0
- http://www.mlive.com/newsflash/michigan/index.ssf?/base/business-10/1173298156249400.xml&storylist=business
- http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article1480012.ece
And not a minute too soon! Hard times coming for some goofs I know!
[edit] Original research
I removed the link to your blog from Scooter's article. It is very obviously original research, and therefore not appropriate as an external link, or as a reliable source in an article. For it to be usable in any form, it would have to be referenced by a reliable secondary source, such as a newpaper article mentioning it. Then you could cite the secondary source, and also cite the blog as a primary source referenced by the secondary. But on its own, it cannot be used as a source or link on Wikipedia. - Crockspot 18:46, 11 March 2007 (UTC)