User talk:Pschemp/Archive 4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to the current talk page.

Contents 1 Whoa! 2 Request for Adminship 3 Congrats! 4 To work! 5 Japanese Macrons mediation 6 Finny 7 User:Swatjester is patronising vandals and trolls 8 ProhibitOnions's RfA 9 Thank you 10 My RfA 11 Wikispying 12 Unblock now User:Romania 13 Unblock now !!11!!! User:Larbot 14 User:Cyprus 15 Rory block 16 Question 17 Please unblock Netscott 18 Rosalind Franklin 19 Happy Easter! 20 Cyprus > RatherBeBiking 21 IRC ban 22 Aww... 23 Passover's over! Yay! 24 Coffee 25 Borg 26 Have fun (or try to) 27 Old Skool Esperanzial note 28 User:160490 29 thanks 30 Congrats. 31 Leaving? 32 Contact 33 Thanks for voting in my RfA! 34 At long last! 35 Present for you. 36 A smile for you 37 Boo! 38 Thank you for your nomination and comments in Lar's RfA! 39 Geotextiles 40 Schools 41 Block 42 COTW Project 43 Deletion review 44 List of NHL players 45 FYI 46 Nice gallbladder

Whoa!

Nice response to User:Masssiveego on Fang Aili's RFA. You're not exactly one for mincing words, are you? ;) Matt Yeager ♫ (Talk?) 23:33, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

um, no? :) pschemp | talk 18:47, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Request for Adminship

Congratulations! Consensus having been reached, it is my pleasure to inform you that you are now an administrator on the English Wikipedia. Please take a moment to review the Administrators' reading list and the Administrators' how-to guide before using any of your shiny new buttons. :-) If you need assistance or advice, please feel free to request help from other administrators at the Administrator's Noticeboard and Administrator's Noticeboard for Incidents, or to leave a talk page message for me or any other admin. Again, congratulations! Essjay ^{Talk • Contact} 17:43, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

Congrats!

Please add congrats for pschemp here so it's all in one spot! :)

I'd like to be the first to extend congratulations to my favourite cat herder! I know you'll do well with the mop. — nathanrdotcom ^{(T • C • W)} 01:44, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Mazel tov on becoming an admin!!! :-) Where ^(talk) 01:44, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Let me extend my congratulations too. There really wasn't much to do in Admin Coaching, as you were excellently prepared to begin with. :) Titoxd^{(?!? - help us)} 03:03, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Congrats! :P I wanted to promote you but the downtime caused Essjay to haha. Oh well :D. Now you can go all rogue like me. — Ilyanep (Talk) 03:57, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Nice one pschemp! Now get out there and wheel war with the best of them! ++Lar: t/c 04:50, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

I want my vote back. That thank you was naff! Could you be any terser?? ++Lar: t/c 01:27, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Hi :) Congratulations, you'll do well! --JoanneB 09:57, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Goody! I'd love to see you vandalslaying and cleaning up! Cheerz!--Tdxiang 陈 鼎 翔 ^(Talk)Contributions Chat with Tdxiang on IRC! 05:05, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations, pschemp, I know you're going to be a fine admin. --Alf ^melmac 06:28, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations! Basically what all the above people said. :) Welcome to the...cabal... Banez 08:08, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Congrats! —Pengo (& ) 10:38, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

You know, on second thought, I never got a finny.... :P — Ilyanep (Talk) 11:27, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Perhaps if you had been less of a slacker (i.e. faster to promote)?? :-P ++Lar: t/c 16:30, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations! --Misza13 ^{T C} 11:50, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Congrats! You deserve this! --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 15:31, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations! _-M ^o P-_ 01:10, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

• Congratulations! - Mailer Diablo 01:18, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
• I like your thank you note - polite and educational. Congratulations! Flowerparty? 01:31, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Good job on your RFA, you deserved it! ILovEPlankton 01:58, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations on becoming an admin. I'm sure you'll make a fine one.--Alhutch 02:42, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Congrats! Thanks for the nice note on my talk page!--Adam ^(talk) 02:55, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Awesome work. I knew you'll make it. Congrats! (^'-')^ Covington 03:51, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations! To celebrate, I thought I'd throw a kitten at you :o) ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 08:36, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations and well done! -- Natalya 11:23, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

From me too, good luck :-o --Cactus.man ✍ 13:25, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations! Continue your fine work as an editor. --Terence Ong 13:44, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations from the land of snow and ice. 14:44, 11 April 2006 (UTC) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by CambridgeBayWeather (talk • contribs).

Congradulations, recently there are good quality candidates to vote on, finally. Fad (ix) 18:30, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Congrats! We were promoted at about the same time. :) --Fang Aili ^說嗎? 20:15, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

To work!

Wow, I thought you must be an admin already! Congrats! But someone appears to think I am too (nothing to do with my bossy manner, I'm sure, ahem...). Any chance you could help him out? Cheers v much, JackyR 20:27, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

thanks, I'm not getting involved though. Other people have this under control. pschemp | talk 12:03, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Hmm, seeing the below I'm really sorry to have mentioned this guy. I've been trying to help him as a newbie, but... Oh well, sorry 'bout that. JackyR 14:01, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

No problem. I don't really mind, I just don't need to jump in the fray 'cause other people already are dealing with it. Feel free to ask me if you need anything another time though. pschemp | talk 17:54, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Japanese Macrons mediation

Will you pop off a message to Freshgavin and Mitsukai asking them to come in and give their "yeah" or "nay" regarding the proposal? I'd like to get this mediation settled, and they are the only two who haven't commented on Proposal #2. Thanks! --日本穣 Nihonjoe 01:31, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Looks like everyone has responded now. (^_^) --日本穣 Nihonjoe 04:54, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

YEah! Thank you for the note. I have commented on the resolution. pschemp | talk 05:18, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Finny

Hahaha. Well thanks for that :D — Ilyanep (Talk) 01:53, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

User:Swatjester is patronising vandals and trolls

Pschemp: I was watching the RC patrol on IRC. saw Anwar saadat has blanked someone elses user page citing "they gave themselves barn-stars". Well as far as I know, that's not against policy: they can do what they want with it. But it IS agaisnt policy to blank other people's user pages. So, I gave him a warning. A few seconds later I saw that he'd done it to a second user page. I gave a second warning. I explained myself the first time. For some reason unbeknownst to me, saadat copy and pasted the whole conversation onto my talk.( Apparently because I "didn't respond" despite my explanations). Do with it what you will, but thought you should be aware of what happened. I'm in the IRC cvu channel if you'd like. ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 10:08, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Go see the history of both Prin and Man's Plans. They are one and the same. The same bloke from London uses an alias. He has been vandalising and extreme trolling on my user page and article on Ajith and creating fake articles about fictional entities. Ignorance is not an excuse. You have clearly abused your powers by threatening to block me when I tried to rectify their graffiti. Self-awarded barnstars are not acceptable. What kinda moderator are you? Anwar saadat 10:22, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

(a) It doesn't matter if they're vandals. You don't have the right to blank their user page. (B) I don't know of any wikipedia policy about self-awarded barnstars. Would you like to show me one saying they're unacceptable? (C) I'm not a moderator at all. Hence, I could not have abused my powers. (D) deleting the warnings from your talk page is considered vandalism. (E) Why are we talking about this on Pschemps page? ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 10:25, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

(a) If it doesn't matter whether the suer is a vandal or editor in good faith, then there is no point in arguing with you. (b) As I said earlier, ignorance is not an excuse. You are not fit to advise others on proper conduct (c)(d) Well, you deleted my edits from your user page. Is that not vandalism? (e) Bcoz she is admin. You are not. And you are under scrutiny now for patronising vandals and trolls and threatening/bullying to block users Anwar saadat 10:32, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

As amusing as this is, I don't want to disrupt Pschemps page any more. You've been warned again not to blank your warnings from your talk. The next time, you will lose your ability to edit your talk page. I won't be responding on this page anymore. If you want, you can respond on your own talk page. Pschemp, the situation isn't that difficult to figure out. Essjay and I are monitoring him from IRC. ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 10:35, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Like omg, I have no interest in this at all. Anwar, you can stop posting here 'cause I'm not getting involved. pschemp | talk 12:03, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

ProhibitOnions's RfA

Thank you, Pschemp/Archive 4!
	...for voting in my RFA. It passed with a result of 58/2/0. If you have any comments, or for some reason need any new-admin help, please let me know here. Regards, ProhibitOnions 22:59, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

And congrats yourself! Regards, ProhibitOnions 14:39, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you! Hello Pschemp/Archive 4. Thank you for your support in my RfA! It passed with a final tally of 91/3/5. I am quite humbled and pleased by the community's show of confidence in me. If you need help or just want to talk, let me know. Cheers! -- Fang Aili 說嗎?

My RfA

Many thanks for your support on my recent RfA. It was successful. Thanks again, Mark83 19:34, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Wikispying

Hi! I have an assignment/request if you're willing... remind me to talk to you about it next time we get a chance? ++Lar: t/c 20:25, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Unblock now User:Romania

Unblock now User:Romania. Either you block all the users with such names e.g. like User:Macedonia either you unblock him now. I suggest the latter one option. Iasi 06:25, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks but I'll make my own decisions. For the record, neither username is appropriate. pschemp | talk 06:49, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Well I will report you to be desysoped if you don't make one decision quickly enough. I still suggest you to give credit and unblock him now. Or you can block all users with such names. I will make you a full list for you if you need it.--Iasi 06:51, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Oh yes, threatening me will really help your case. pschemp | talk

Unblock now !!11!!! User:Larbot

because bots must be free! (Insert clever/threatening language here) ++Lar: t/c 14:50, 13 April 2006 (UTC) Er wait, it's not blocked. Never mind...

User:Cyprus

Ugh, fine, how do I change it? (who really cares anyway?)Cyprus 14:41, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Follow the instructions on Wikipedia:Changing usernames. Thank you. pschemp | talk 14:44, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Rory block

Thanks once more for offering a lucid, reasoned explanation for this block; even as I am not, as I explained to Essjay, altogether certain that I would have blocked, even in view of Essjay's warning, I am altogether convinced that the justifications given were sufficient to support a block and that Essjay wasn't simply affecting a new 'crat arrogance, as otherwise I might have feared (although, inasmuch as my past encounters with Essjay and with you have been uniformly positive, I suppose those fears were unfounded in any case).  :) Joe 17:46, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Question

Do you think Romanian (talk • contribs) is the same guy as Romania (talk • contribs)? He just deleted someone's message off a talk page. --Khoikhoi 21:21, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

See a nice collection in User:Bonaparte/sockpuppetry. `'mikka (t) 02:55, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Please unblock Netscott

The content of the link aside, Netscott was clearly acting in good faith re the WP:3RR, and quit reverting when he thought he'd run out. Further, he did discuss his changes on the talk page. It is rather Anonymous editor who declined discussion. Netscott should be unblocked.Timothy Usher 04:39, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

The link he re-inserted 4 times was and is clearly offensive. Regardless, he did revert 4 times in less than 24 hours, whatever the intention. Next time he can be more careful. No unblock. pschemp | talk 04:44, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

I've unblocked him on the condition that he not edit the page for 24 hours. If he does, I will reblock. If the circumstances do not improve on that article, however, I am likely to recommend an RfC or RfAr. Kelly Martin (talk) 04:57, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Not a problem, that's the point anyway, to cool off.pschemp | talk 05:03, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

He approached me on IRC and asked for assistance. It's believable to me, given the edit summaries and such, that he was "debating via reverts", which, while kinda dumb, is not really edit warring. I've advised him to not do this in the future, and to lay off the "AGF" rhetoric. Hopefully he'll improve. Kelly Martin (talk) 05:07, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Rosalind Franklin

You have contributed to the Rosalind Franklin article. It has recently had a rewrite and been had a request for peer review. Your comments would be appreciated. Alun 14:10, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Happy Easter!

(Please put all tasty Easter wishes here)

Cyprus > RatherBeBiking

I would not have agreed with the Username change, and certianly not as promplty and easily as I did, If I had known my entire talk page would be erased. This is very frustrating. Is there anyway to retrieve this information? Not to mention my User page.

annoyed, and seeking guidance (once again) - Cyprus 14:12, 16 April 2006 (UTC) PS: Why my signature is left as Cyprus still, I have no Idea. Doe's anybody really care if my Username is Cyprus? Their internation disputes seem so minimal, and so docile, that I doubt any user on Wikipedia would really have a problem with it. And if they did, why haven't they said anything? Have you recieved complaints from users about me? I doubt it. Whatever, I'm just here to help wikipedia, as you are, and all I ask is for my talk page and old user page back, even if I have to keep my new name. Cyprus 14:15, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the note, I'll look into itpschemp | talk 14:46, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Ok if you go to User:Cyprus You'll see the whole talk and user page are still there...as far as I can tell they were never erased, you are just linking to the new blank one. Anyway, to change your sig, go to "my preferences" and type what you want it to say in the Nickname box. Hope this helps. If you want to forward the old page to the new, just copy the old info over to User:RatherBeBiking and then leave #REDIRECT [[User:RatherBeBiking]] at the top of the blank page. If you need help doing any of this, let me know. pschemp | talk 14:51, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

By the way, usually when a crat renames a user, they use the move tool to move the old user's page to the new user's user namespace. I dunno what happened here, but, being an admin, you could have done that :P — Ilyanep (Talk) 01:38, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Or at least I do... — Ilyanep (Talk) 01:39, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

- Thanks for your help, I appreciate it. RatherBeBiking 01:02, 17 April 2006 (UTC) (I'm not sure I was able to figure out how to fix the signature issue)

IRC ban

How have I been harrassing and threatening other users (apart from using !slap too much, which is at a stretch)? Sceptre ^(Talk) 02:32, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

You know what you did. pschemp | talk 17:21, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

I've got logs as well, and I can't see what I did Will (^E_@) T 21:29, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

I passed on my information the EA AC. If they hadn't agreed with the ban, they would have overturned it. The authority in that channel lies with them, and their decision was to let the ban stand. If you don't like it, take it up the AC. pschemp | talk 19:02, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Aww...

You reverted the deceased Wikipedian thing before I got a chance to reply! I was going to get all pedantic and stuff :) — Ilyanep (Talk) 02:59, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

sorry :) but that was just weird. pschemp | talk 03:31, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

*sneaks onto the talk page and drops off a truckload of chocolate* — nathanrdotcom ^{(T • C • W)} 04:21, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Passover's over! Yay!

mmmmm....bread :) yay! thanks for the yeasty goodness :) pschemp | talk 00:38, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Here's lots of snacks with bready goodness!

A blueberry muffin.	More tasty muffins	Timbits aka "doughnut holes"	Donuts fresh from the oven
...and of course, your favourite!	...and even more cookies!	Girl Scout cookies (made with real Girl Scouts)	A fortune cookie!

Enjoy! — nathanrdotcom ^{(T • C • W)} 01:37, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

omg its a snackflood. hehe. well I sure prefer it to the other kind. :) thank you! pschemp | talk 02:15, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Anytime for the Cookienatrix. — nathanrdotcom ^{(T • C • W)} 05:57, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Coffee

Borg

A friendly reminder that you are now a member of the collective. -JCarriker 17:14, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Have fun (or try to)

Happy travellings! Here, have some chocolate... — nathanrdotcom ^{(T • C • W)} 21:01, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Old Skool Esperanzial note

Since this isn't the result of an AC meeting, I have decided to go Old Skool. This note is to remind you that the elections are taking place now and will end at 23:50 UTC on 2006-04-29. Please vote here. Thanks. --Celestianpower ^háblame 20:42, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

User:160490

Please, reconsider deblocking of User:160490, since User:159753 is a normal living user. -- Vít Zvánovec 19:15, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

thanks

A bullet proof doublewide hurricane blown shoppingcart thanks from a homeless RFA candidate!!!! Thanks for the kind words, it means a lot. ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 01:19, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Congrats.

(Let's all put our congrats in one place :))

I'd like to offer my advance (before anyone decides anything) congrats on winning the ESP election. — nathanrdotcom ^{(T • C • W)} 19:58, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Indeed; mazel tov! Where ^(talk) 01:28, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Lots of congratulations, Pschemp! -- Natalya 11:24, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations, and this cute little fellow is here to remind you to be bold in doing what's right for Esperanza. Well done and best wishes! ++Lar: t/c 15:36, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

• Congrats! --Terence Ong 10:15, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Hello, this is my belated congratulations :) — Ilyanep (Talk) 01:02, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Leaving?

Hey Pschemp,

From your edit summary at the Esperanza members page, I take it you too are leaving Esperanza?! That is very unfortunate - I'm sorry that the disagreements have led you to do this. You will be missed. Even though you say it's for good, we can always hope you'll come back, no? Regardless, I hope you have not been too hurt. -- Natalya 17:59, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

no disagreements, just tired of people being immature. So I'm leaving the assylum to the inmates.pschemp|talk 18:03, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Hopefully the rest of the world will not be as crazy. :) -- Natalya 18:04, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Hang in there. And fix that typo... Grin. ++Lar: t/c 19:32, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Contact

I know you won't be on the Esperanza IRC channel, but send me a message if you're on IRC at all. I'll probably be on several channels, including #wikipedia, #wikipedia-en, vandalism, bootcamp, etc. Hope to talk to you soon. EWS23 | (Leave me a message!) 19:48, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Hehe, I returned from wikibreak early, figured out what I had to do to be happier myself. Same as EWS23, give me a shout sometime. -- SonicAD (talk) 03:12, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Same here, and remember that you still have the loyalty and fidelity of the the cabal. -JCarriker 03:55, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for voting in my RfA!

Thank you very much for your comment and for voting in my RfA! I really appreciate it. The nomination did not get consensus, but I'm happy I accepted it. - Amgine 21:06, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

At long last!

My dear Pschemp, I know you told me your userpage had gone through a "long history of crappiness" (!) and I promised to... umm... solve it? Anyway, as you know, late is better than never, so here it is! Hope you like it. If you do, just copy the text straight into your userpage, and of course, you can always modify it at will. If you want me to retouch it, just try me and I'll do my best ;) I hope you're doing fine, dear, since I reckon from your last contribs that Wikistress is getting to you :( If you ever need someone to talk to, you can always count on me. Hugs, Phaedriel ♥ tell me - 00:25, 11 May 2006 (UTC) PS. The barnstar wasn't in your original design... I hope you don't mind if I added it...? ;)

I really like the new design. — nathanrdotcom ^{(Got something to say? Say it.)} 05:46, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Love it, love it, love you P. ! pschemp | talk 18:17, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Present for you.

.... However, this is cooler!!!!

So there... most pages have too many cats as it is. ++Lar: t/c 02:36, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

A smile for you

Boo!

Saw that you were back earlier today, at least temporarily. Hope you're having fun on your trip, and look forward to having you back on the Wikipedia team full-time in a week or two. :o) EWS23 | (Leave me a message!) 19:06, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your nomination and comments in Lar's RfA!

We are here to build an encyclopedia!

Hi Pschemp, and thank you for your nomination (it meant a lot to me personally, although man you were wordy!!!) and your kind comments in my request for adminship! With a final tally of (109/5/1), I have been entrusted with adminship. It's been several weeks since the conclusion of the process, so hopefully you've had a chance to see me in action. Please let me know what you think! Thanks again! ++Lar: t/c 03:25, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Adverts: Like The Beatles?... Like LEGO?... In a WikiProject that classifies?... Are you an accountable admin?... Got DYK?...

Geotextiles

You removed a redirect I made from Geotextiles to Geosynthetics, I feel that the Geotextile article is of poor quality and misleading. You state your reason for removing the redirect "redirect inappropriate, not all geotextiles are synthetics. many are made of natural fibers," true some are made of natural fibres but the vast majority aren't. However regardless of their composistion they are still referred to as Geosynthetics by industry and academia alike, the article should refelct this (although I will make a point of fibrous geotextiles in the Geosynthetic article). On a seperate note the Geotextile article doesn't even mention any materials used for Geotextiles, synthetic or fibrous. I think the Geotextile article should be redirected/completely rewritten for a few reasons:

• It mentions very little about Geotextiles, 2 lines at most; not even that they are usually manufarctured as woven or non-woven or any of their constituent materials.
• The inclusion of Geomembranes and Geonets is unwarranted as they are not geotextiles. This could easily confuse lay readers
• No pictures
• It mentions their applications but doesn't elaborate
• Not wikified

Overall if you removed anything that wasn't to do with geotextiles from the article it would be about 4 lines long and would then certainly warrant a redirect.

I hope to bring the standard of the Geosynthetic/Geotextile/Geonet etc. articles up from stubs and I hope by grouping the article together under their industry wide recognised title of Geosynthetics that the article will be more than a stub and allow the lay reader to achieve a wider appreceation of the subject. Also I hope collaboration will be stimulated by a larger grouped article than smaller stubs. I shall add the point about fibrous materials to the Geosynthetics article but I shall not redirect the Geotextile article unless we can agree on its necessity, I have no wish to enter into a heated edit war and such.

Regards Grahams Child 09:20, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

I was taught that Geotextiles was the umbrella term. I suspect that we are hitting a difference in international terminology here. I agree the article is crap, but I really don't think its appropriate to put everything under Geosynthetics. However, I'm confident we can work it out. pschemp | talk 11:58, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

I think you may be correct there, I'm writing from the sunny shores of England and yourself from the US? Geotextiles is a term often used here to describe products that are not (as far as we know in Engand ;)) geotextiles; as the current geotextiles article shows only too well. Perhaps this confusion of terms warrants a paragrapgh in the article?

Do you think there is a case for merging the two articles under a new title; such as Geosynthetics/Geotextiles or Geosynthetics & Geotextiles etc? Also as your qualifications allow you, would you lay a critical eye over my Geosynthetics article as it is pretty fresh off the workbench and could do with some scrutiny, especially form non lay editors. I am from an engineering background so your Textile/Chemical background should give a different perspective on the article.

Hope we can bring these articles up to where they should be. Regards Grahams Child 13:25, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Schools

More than one, although the exact number ranges from four to six, depending on which country you come from.

Samsara (talk • contribs) 10:07, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

I liked the first revision. :) pschemp | talk 10:45, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Block

FYI , you blocked me even though I did not do 3 RRs on Muslim. They were edits. Perhaps next time you might research the matter a bit more thoroughly rather than jumping to a block. No hard feelings though. Have a good day.--CltFn 12:39, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

COTW Project

You voted for Lee Smith (baseball), this week's Collaboration of the week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Davood (talk • contribs).

Deletion review

An editor has nominated the closure or deletion of the article NHL players A and others for deletion review. Since you closed the deletion discussion for, or speedy-deleted this article, your opinions on this will be greatly appreciated. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 06:44, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

List of NHL players

You deleted all the player lists before a discussion could even take place. It is not an attempt at googlebombing or anything like that. There was a link to hockeydb.com because hockeydb.com has a list of all the stats and it was used as a reference to each player, which helps keep out vanity articles (which people like to do). Having the link beside each player also makes creating their article much easier. If you had problems with the articles, then they should be fixed, not deleted. Masterhatch 07:21, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

FYI

Category_talk:Administrators_open_to_recall#Comments_in_Requests_for_Adminship ++Lar: t/c 18:54, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Nice gallbladder

Hey! Nice gallbladder! — The Mac Davis] ⌇☢ ญƛ. 05:51, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

thanks. Its gone now though :) pschemp | talk 10:45, 7 June 2006 (UTC)