User talk:PS2pcGAMER

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive
Archives

Welcome to my talk page. Feel free to leave me a message if you a question, comment, or just want to say hi. Just make sure to sign it (with ~~~~) and create a subsection for it at the bottom of the page.

Contents


[edit] TG Dog

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 15:42, 29 March 2007 (UTC) Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Davesmith33"

You will notice if you removed those rose-tinted spectacles that it is DrFrench and yourself who are in fact undoing other people's edits repeatedly, without first discussing them on the talk page.

Can you tell me exactly what is wrong with the following statement: "Richard Hammond introduced a new "presenter" at the start of Series 8, a female Labradoodle named "Top Gear Dog", who is susceptible to motion sickness. However, she only appeared twice in Series 9."? Davesmith33 15:48, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Removing protection from James Brown article

After concerted effort to stop the constant vandalism (especially when the article was featured on the Music Portal in February 2007) to the James Brown article, I had asked the administrators to restore protection. This article was repeated vandalized several times daily up to when the protection was restored to the article. However, I see that you removed the protection from the article? Can you provide your rationale as to why protection is no longer needed? And...on what basis have YOU decided that protection is no longer needed, since I don't see that you have contributed in a significant way to editing the article, followed the history of repeatedly restoring the content of the article, or even spent time reverting the vandalism yourself??? This significant change should have been discussed first on the talk page, where you would have gotten feedback as to why the article was protected in the first place.

In spite of the vandalism that repeatedly occurred when the article was unprotected, this article was still vandalized even by users with accounts older than four days. In fact, the article was vandalized AGAIN right after you removed the protection. Have YOU reviewed the history before removing the protection on the article? I disagree strongly with the removal of the protection and plan to reverse both the recent vandalism and your change to restore the protection a third time or ask the administrators to get involved a third time. lwalt 16:29, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Davesmith33

I am getting rather frustrated by his actions. It seem to me that as he couldn't have his way over TGD, he's thrown his toys out of the pram. It seeems to me a clear case of WP:DISRUPT. I really dislike the idea of 'running to teacher' but I am sorely tempted to put it to an WP:RFC. I know as an admin you probably shouldn't get too involved where there is existing 'discussion' between you and him, but if you can put your 'neutral head' on, what has been the outcome of similar situations that you've come across in the past? DrFrench 22:17, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

I think I'm going to sleep on it and see what he's like in the morning. If he's doing the same, then I'll go down the WP:RFC route. DrFrench 22:57, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Sadly since his 3RR block, he doesn't to have changed his approach, so I've posted {{rfc-ucc}} on his talk page. Hopefully he'll take note and try to build consensus. DrFrench 20:39, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] TG

There should be a guideline to not submit a TV show for GA while it is still showing. The cruft levels just got too high over the past couple of months, time for another prune. And our friend Dave didn't help things either! --Steve (Stephen) talk 01:31, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Decision about the US Cinema template

After receiving complaints about the inclusion of Template:CinemaoftheUS in film articles, I have discussed the issue with Blofeld and (at least) the two of us agree that it is removed from American film articles (see also talk page). Hoverfish Talk 20:52, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

I have also reduced the size of the template we think it should go in only the central /core articles only not on any film or actor articles. This is only for the American template ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Expecting you" Contribs 21:06, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Sorry for the slow reply. Thanks for the update and hard work on coming to a compromise. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 07:45, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image

Can you delete this:[1]? It's not even really a screenshot. I was going to try to come up with some rationale to use it in the article to illustrate the person's artisitic abilities but I don't think it will pass fair use muster. At least I don't see any way. Thanks in advance. Quadzilla99 12:08, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

I uploaded it by the way, in case that wasn't clear. Quadzilla99 12:09, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Actually I found and added a different tag, maybe you could just look it over, if you feel it doesn't merit inclusion you can just delete it—no explanation needed. Quadzilla99 12:15, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Great idea! I'd be glad to help out. Right now I'm writing an article in my sandbox but I'll contribute today or tomorrow. Quadzilla99 10:02, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Arbitration proceedings

You have been included as a 'related party' in a request for arbitration Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Bullying_and_Victimisation_against_Davesmith33 Davesmith33 17:57, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../p/s/2/User_talk%7EPS2pcGAMER_9645.html"