Talk:Przemysł II

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ]
(If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
This article is supported by the Royalty and nobility work group.
Przemysł II is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Poland on Wikipedia. To participate simply edit the article or see our current projects and discussions. On the main project page we have some tools to help you out. Don't hesitate to ask questions!
Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale.
Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Edit of 12 June 2006

Here's what I did:

  • rm superfluous "See also" section: links contained w/i article
  • rm double linking and red links which will never be created
  • rm superfluous section header "Biography"
  • rm image of Piast coat of arms (what's the point?)
  • retooled image format of seals and put them in a gallery beside the sections on marriages and realms
  • format of opening line: changing name in bold to "Premislas" and adding alternative names in English, Latin, Polish
  • more proper format for "Sources"
  • ordered sections in a more logical way to make the information about him and his reign accessible

I would like to see these types of cleanups at other Polish monarchs, most of which are aesthetic messes. Finally, I think this should be moved to a title like Premislas II of Poland or Premislaus II of Poland, but I won't press it. Srnec 20:20, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

I agree on naming to English. Marrtel 18:49, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

I disagree. "Premislas" is a strange translation and used only in several Google Books results. Appleseed (Talk) 21:06, 29 June 2006 (UTC)