User talk:Professor marginalia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Professor marginalia is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia soon.

Welcome!

Hello, Professor marginalia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Lumos3 18:47, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for the welcome..Do I sign like this? Professor marginalia 01:43, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

1 Invitation to join a Project
2 New Project Page and Invitation
3 Mediation
4 Request for Mediation
5 Blanking of Lydia Jackson
6 Edit warring
7 Arbitration
8 Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Waldorf education
9 Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Waldorf education
10 Reopening of arbitration
11 Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Waldorf education/Review

[edit] Invitation to join a Project

Dear Professor, I am starting a project to overhaul and balance the article on Waldorf ed. I would like to invite you to take part because of your ongoing contributions to the page. Please le me know at my Talk page if you would like to participate. Wonderactivist 16:40, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Dear Professor,

I appreciate your questioning the need for a project - it is an important step. I plan to use "requests for comment" as Longhair suggested in his note back to me. I also pla to continue getting input from him and other Wiki admnistrators. I think that at some point it is going to have to be clear that the page on Wikipedia has to be concise, clear, and unbiased - on both sides.

I think a project will help to move some of the in-fighting off of the page's discussion section and onto a project page - and then with admin help, it can hopefully end the disputes.

Thanks and I hope you'll join the team! Lucie Wonderactivist 14:45, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] New Project Page and Invitation

Dear Professor M, I just want to again invite you to join the project - the project page has been moved to its proper Wiki place (I am here a year and still a newbie really), User:Wonderactivist/Waldorf Project Team Page. I really think you have a whole lot to offer this project and with the help of unbiased Wiki editors, I believe we can end the ongoing edit wars that have been the waste of so much time for so many really good people. Please do join us, we're currently talking about the introduction. Wonderactivist 02:22, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mediation

A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Rudolf Steiner, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible. Hgilbert 08:58, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Request for Mediation

A Request for Mediation to which you are a party has been accepted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Rudolf Steiner.

For the Mediation Committee, Essjay (Talk)

This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to open new mediation cases. If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

This message delivered: 12:01, 15 October 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Blanking of Lydia Jackson

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Lydia Jackson. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Schutz 18:29, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, this standard template was probably a bit harsh; your edit, even though you actually blanked the page, was probably done in good faith and was not vandalism, as discussed on my talk page. Schutz 00:09, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Edit warring

This was many reverts over several days, but with further investigation of Pete K, the block on you does not appear to have been warranted. Keep in mind, however, that repeatedly reverting is is not a solution to any dispute regardless of the character of the other party. A revision is not going to be implemented simply by reverting. If Pete K continues with personal attacks, edit warring, or other disruption, please report it to me on User talk:Centrx or to another administrator, such as on Wikipedia:Administrator's noticeboard. —Centrx→talk • 23:08, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Arbitration

There is a current request for arbitration relating to the articles Waldorf education, Anthroposophy, Rudolf Steiner and Rudolf Steiner's views on race and ethnicity. Hgilbert 01:37, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Waldorf education

Hello,

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Waldorf education. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Waldorf education/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Waldorf education/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Thatcher131 01:30, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Waldorf education

The above entitled arbitration case has closed, and the final decision has been issued at the above link. Waldorf education, Rudolf Steiner, Anthroposophy and the extended family of related articles such as Social Threefolding are placed on article probation. Editors of these articles are expected to remove all original research and other unverifiable information, including all controversial information sourced in Anthroposophy related publications. It is anticipated that this process may result in deletion or merger of some articles due to failure of verification by third party peer reviewed sources. If it is found, upon review by the Arbitration Committee, that any of the principals in this arbitration continue to edit in an inappropriate and disruptive way editing restrictions may be imposed. Review may be at the initiative of any member of the Arbitration Committee on their own motion or upon petition by any user to them.

For the arbitration committee, Thatcher131 23:41, 30 December 2006 (UTC)