Template talk:ProbDistributions
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Not Italic
This template is a good idea, but I think we should not have italics in such a small font, its hard to read. See for example Template:popgen. PAR 00:27, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- Good call, I removed them. --Btyner 01:48, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] ==
in the figures $\lambda$ is not defined !!!
could someone make teh connections with the theory?
thanksAusloos 09:24, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] =
[edit] I love Wikipedia
It helps a lot to study for my final exams. thanks wiki;)
[edit] "degree" distribution?
Is this a true distribution? It seems not to be, or certainly not descibed as one. Baccyak4H (talk) 02:36, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
- No, judging from the definition of degree distribution. Removed. --MarkSweep (call me collect) 03:41, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
And again, is the "fading" distribution in the same boat? Baccyak4H (Yak!) 20:08, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Benford's law
I added a link to Benford's law, which itself implies a very well defined discrete distribution. I do note that that page is not of similar format to most other distribution pages, so if some think its inclusion in this template is problematic, let's discuss. Baccyak4H (Yak!) 19:49, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] missing
frechet and log-gamma are missing... --84.75.21.114 12:41, 31 March 2007 (UTC)