ProductSifter

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

An editor has expressed a concern that the subject of the article does not satisfy the notability guideline or one of the following guidelines for inclusion on Wikipedia: Biographies, Books, Companies, Fiction, Music, Neologisms, Numbers, Web content, or several proposals for new guidelines.

If you are familiar with the subject matter, please expand the article to establish its notability. The best way to address this concern is to reference published, third-party sources about the subject. If notability cannot be established, the article is more likely to be considered for deletion, per Wikipedia:Guide to deletion. (See also Wikipedia:Notability)
This article has been tagged since March 2007.

ProductSifter.com is an English language product review website whose content is generated by specialist consumer journalists from around the world. As such it is an example of on-line journalism. Unlike other web 2.0 offerings, ProductSifter does not publish amateur user-generated content. Rather, it is a professional product review site and uses only professional critics whose qualifications and credentials are established and can be independently scrutinised.

ProductSifter.com is owned by the UK company ProductSifter Limited and is headquartered in London, England. It was launched in 2006 and is classified by Yahoo as a consumer advocacy site.

1 Characteristics and Content
2 Differentiation from other review sites
3 Background
4 Discussion
5 References
6 External Links

[edit] Characteristics and Content

ProductSifter carries reviews of a wide range of consumer products and services as well as reviews of travel destinations. The majority of internet links on the site are non-commercial, directing users to additional, background or technical information. Journalists contributing to the site identify what are in their view the best five products in their specialist area, classifying them according to consumer need, citing reference sources and explaining their reasoning^[1]. For each set of products recommended, the site publishes a critical “overview” of the area giving background, warnings and buying tips.

[edit] Differentiation from other review sites

ProductSifter.com is distinguished from other consumer product review sites in a number of ways:

While sites such as ReviewCentre.com, Amazon.com and Epinions.com publish anecdotal reviews from users, ProductSifter pays for objective reviews written by professional consumer journalists with recognised expertise in their field. Their work is checked for balance and accuracy by other journalists before publication;
There are no anonymous reviews; all writers are named and a brief resume of their credentials is given at the head of each review. In most cases the writer’s name is linked to a more detailed biography, enabling site visitors to assess for themselves the writer’s qualifications);
ProductSifter.com differs from organisations such as Which? or Consumer Reports, both of which also compare products within categories, but also produce magazines. ProductSifter is not published in a paper form and no registration or subscription is required.

[edit] Background

ProductSifter describes itself as “run by journalists”^[2] . Its founders say it was established partly as a reaction to studies showing consumers spend an average of 12 hours online researching consumer products before making a purchase^[3]. (see alsoCEA/Yahoo study) and partly as a reaction to the related phenomenon of user-generated review sites being manipulated by businesses and others.

[edit] Discussion

While it is now generally accepted that online opinion has a big influence over purchasing decisions^[3]^[4], there are also questions on the value of user reviews on two main counts: first that users are often moved to write reviews only when their experience of a product is at the extremes of bad or good; and, second, a user may write a review based on experience of only one product in any category (ie, the one they happened to buy) and thus they may lack any real knowledge with which to draw comparisons^[5]. Kevin Kelly, writing on CoolTools, puts it succinctly when he says: "The fault of user reviews, however, is that they often have narrow experience and no sense of what else is out there. This is the chief weakness of (user reviews); they judge too much on an item's own merits and not on how it compares with similar products or substitutes". There are also well-documented cases of individuals and companies presenting reviews of their own products as if they are from a customer: this has led to a new European Directive^[6] which will outlaw falsely presenting oneself as a consumer in internet reviews in Europe from the end of 2007. ProductSifter endeavours to avoid such criticisms by using only accredited journalists. The social-networking site Lifehack.org (a site dedicated to lifefacks, ie, ways to do things more efficiently) describes ProductSifter as an example of "journalists doing something useful for once".

[edit] References

^ ProductSifter.com, Home Page,[1],2006
^
^ ^a ^b Rushe, D. Online opinion gives power to the people, The Sunday Times, Times Newspapers, February 18, 2007 (available at [2]
^ Customer Satisfaction With E-Commerce Nears All-Time High, ACSI E-Commerce Benchmark, Q4 2006 (available at [3] and summarised in Decker,S. Foresee Study Discovers Online Reviews Drive Higher Satisfaction & a Primary Factor for Purchase, January 12, 2007 (available at [4])
^ Chen, Yubo and Xie, Jinhong, "Online Consumer Review: A New Element of Marketing Communications Mix", July 2004 (Available at SSRN: [5])
^ DIRECTIVE 2005/29/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT (available at [6])