User talk:Princess Tiswas
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Pack of Lies
It wasn't necessary to make the change to this article that you did. I included info about the TV version in the article, and since it was merely a taped version of the play that was broadcast once, a separate article about it is unwarranted. Thanks to your change, if I search for Pack of Lies, nothing comes up, the link for Pack of Lies that was in other articles now leads to the disambiguation page rather than directly to the article I wrote, and the long list that was in "What links here" in the article I wrote has disappeared. I don't know how to correct this. Can you please change my article back to its original title so these problems are eliminated? Thanks! SFTVLGUY2 17:02, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
-
- Thanks for your response. I incorrectly assumed you just joined Wikipedia based on the welcome message posted to your discussion page. Thanks for correcting the Pack of Lies problem! SFTVLGUY2 17:11, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Panic prevention disco
forgive me, but i do not understand what issue you have with my panic prevention disco page. I have cited verifiable references and it relates to another article - Jamie T-- i will continue to delete your speedy deletion messages because there are absolutely no grounds for them.Joeshawuk 12:47, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
- but it clearly fucking is notable, did you not see the "sources and references" section. Whats your explanation for doing this? why don't you actually check these sources?--Joeshawuk 13:13, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
i think i'm right when i say that you are the one that recommended it for speedy deletion. You are therefore the one i have the issue with. you have failed to actually give me a proper explanation, perhaps because you don't have one?--Joeshawuk 13:13, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
- If you continue to vandalise pages such as Panic prevention disco you will also be deleted.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Joeshawuk (talk • contribs).
why specifically choose a page which DOES NOT HAVE QUESTIONABLE NOTABILITY and complain about it? It's so clearly notable. refs and sources are correct. please check and rethink your decision.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Joeshawuk (talk • contribs).
[edit] Speedy deletion - Eyesonff
Princess you have made the request so now lets discuss it at the articles talk page so we can resolve this issue iam waiting there now —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jehuty Strife (talk • contribs).
[edit] Speedy deletion - Generic Issue
I have the same problem with this postpuberting teenager. The good side is that i know his coordinates now. So ... Princess Tiswas ... in 6 weeks i'll be in your city. I'll be very glad to meet you. Refering Wikipedia, i think that if they don't remove this teenies from here, they will have no perspective (in Germany, the "image" is quickly going down in the last 8 months). So Wikipedia ... i'll will not place any articles on this site (because i see that is nonsense - this site is full with such postpuberting teenagers).—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.148.219.194 (talk)
[edit] TC 125
Dear Princess Tiswas, you marked the article on TC 125 for speedy deletion, although it concerns a European initative on the establishment of standards for Electronic Health Records in the European Union???? Pvosta 12:29, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Asta Teamplan
Hi, I'm the user that added the reference about Asta Teamplan. As you can see, I'm new here but I'm trying to learn. I've added the reference to Asta Teamplan because I've felt the information in User Defined Field was not enough for people to understant what's it about. I'm currently working with Asta Teamplan (programming modules for Asta Teamplan at my daily job) and so far this is the only application I know it has the concept of User Defined Field.
By no means was the article intended to be commercial/ad, you can see I've also edited the discussion page when posting the article. If you tell me how to purge the article (because i honestly don't know how), I'll be glad to do it.
Thank you. Mariushm 13:27, 24 November 2006 (UTC)Mariushm
[edit] The Forbidden 5
I have placed my explanation for why I don't believe my recently created article on The Forbidden 5 should be deleted, on that article's Talk Page, as suggested. And while I appreciate the attentiveness(!) with which it was shown, as I was directed toward Wikipedia's guidelines for notability, I should point out that in the same article it says:
"Often, the author is able to add a claim, but didn't know one was required.
If there is a claim, but you feel it doesn't meet the requirements here, you may wish to explain your position to the user, before nominating it for deletion, in case they may be able to improve it (or they may need to add verification for the claim).
Generally, a personal and specific message, about your concerns about the article, on the article's talk page and/or author's talk page, is more helpful than a generic template message."
Mostly I was following Wikipedia's first suggestion for creating a new article, as I have in the past -- "Be bold!" I hope my explanation provides clarification. ----JonChesterfield 14:05, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Macroeconomic Man
For the last time, macroeconomic man is NOT vandelism! how can you talk something of wikipedia what has helped many children understand difficult economic concepts yet leave some of this other crap on here! i will not rest until you realise that macroeconomic man is useful and DESERVES his place on wikipedia. Dan —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Slifer151 (talk • contribs).
[edit] The 7 Shot Screamers
I tried today to create a new article for a st. louis local band. This band is highly important to the st. louis music scene, has released 3 albums, and has gone on national tours. They deserve an article on Wikipedia.
After about 10 minutes of existence, user Danni deleted the article. I can't create a decent article if it isn't allowed to survive. What can I do to make sure this article will not be deleted again? --~Peace out, hasta luego, sayonara, and all those other phrases related to abandonment, death, and melancholy memories of yesterday 22:40, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Teaching English in Italy
Your recommendation to merge this article with "Teaching English as a Foreign Language" is unjustified because my article offers a neutral point of view, while the latter is blatant advertising for unnecessary certificate courses and contains unverifiable claims, vague wording and links to sites that sell unnecessary certificate courses marketed by exaggerated claims. (I recommended deletion of that article, and objected to the editors' "keep" decision.) Please read the two articles carefully and reconsider your position. Thanks. Omadaf 147.163.34.8 19:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC) 27 NOv 06.
- Hi Princess Tiswas, I wanted to let you know that I agreed with your prod nomination to merge Teaching English in Italy. Since the original contributor objected to your proposed deletion / merger, I've nominated it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teaching English in Italy so that it can be discussed by a wider audience. Regards, Accurizer 22:50, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] List of comic book superpowers/temp
you recently ordered a speedy deletion notice on the temp page I created, let's discuss reasoning behind it on the talk page there. Jacobshaven3 11:55, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
- Thankyou for bringing my attention to those policies, i'm not the most wikiliterate and didn't realise I was misusing it. Jacobshaven3 12:20, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Tunbridge wells forum
I've suggested to Dribbling_ak (talk • contribs) that he rename the article and read the links on how to write great articles. I deleted it for lack of context rather than notability issues. - Mgm|(talk) 12:21, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Three Mile Cross (band)
Hi Tiswas. I moved this information off the Three Mile Cross village article. I have no interest in them myself. Sorry if I should have just deleted it. Anyway, I've passed the info about the speedy delete tag onto the originator, User:Henryodbert. Thanks. Verica Atrebatum 13:56, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] proposal to delete kaya toast
tiswas, i think you are being over zealous. i do not know if you are from singapore, but that is unimportant. to call kaya toast a mere variant of toast is to call roti prata a variant of pancakes. there is no other way i can characterise kaya toast as some form of sui generis toast except as to describe it as i have. it is a simple snack, but certainly not bereft of a rich and independent existence. thank you, i will get some people to vote on this issue. of course, any given article is always subject to improvement, but the deletion tag is contested. Chensiyuan 17:08, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] 49 Para
I tagged this for speedy deletion because it is a recreation of a nonsense article that was deleted less than a week ago. The content is copied from the webpage at the bottom of the article, and a reading of the webpage indicates this is an absurd joke/hoax. See this discussion: [[1]]. Thanks. --Charles 18:32, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
We all make these mistakes from time to time. I did not catch it at first (the first time) either. But, a close reading reveals that it is, to use that pithy phrase, bollocks! Thanks. ---Charles 18:40, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Talk template
Did you give up on trying to use that talk template? I see that you have a different one now. I am sorry that I was of so little assistance. As I say, I could not figure it out myself, and another editor (someone who had made alterations to the template that I "borrowed" from another editor) came to my talk page and fixed it. I could never figure out what he did to make it work right, all I know is that he did, and it did. Cheers! ---Charles 05:36, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Currently fighting exhaustion and trying (foolishly) to archive my overly-long talk page, I came across this (in case it interests you at all): [[2]] ---Charles 05:50, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
You're welcome. ---Charles 15:01, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Blue Prism
That template you stuck on my talk page strikes me as very rude. I also think your tagging of the page was very hasty and inaccurate. Did you actually read the article, which in my opinion is encyclopedic and objective, and certainly not blatant advertising, or did you just slap the tags up and move on? Thanks. CiaranG 11:35, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply. The possibility that you didn't read it only crossed my mind because the article in no way satifisfies the criteria for blatant advertising given in Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion. CiaranG 11:45, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- Which? [Wikipedia:Notability (companies and corporations)], section Criteria for Companies and Corporations, item number 1. Thanks. CiaranG 12:18, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Thank you. I will update the article and take your comments on its talk page into account. CiaranG 12:41, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
-
-
[edit] Regarding your Anti-Towers of London vandalism
Do not leave sarcastic comments on my page. - Deathrocker 12:51, 30 November 2006 (UTC) Insertformulahere
[edit] letsrecycle.com
Hi there, I suspected this site would get a CSD tag and was in the process of finding more references to support its inclusion. Please note my contributions to the wikipedia field of waste management. This site is widely used by people across the industry and I feel it is definately noteable, information on it is distributed widely and is used in dispatches by the Environment Agency and other noteable companies. I will add more references when I dig them out. --Alex 15:14, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for the removal of the CSD tag--Alex 15:40, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Proposed deletion notice
An article to which you have contributed, Blue Prism, has been nominated for deletion through the proposed deletion process. If the proposed deletion is not challenged within five days, the article is likely to be deleted. If you disagree with this, you may remove the proposed deletion tag to challenge the deletion, and the article will not be deleted through the proposed deletion process. It is considered courteous, but not required, to provide a reason if you choose to do so. However, the article may subsequently be submitted to the articles for deletion process, where the community will decide whether the article should be kept. Thank you! Seraphimblade 17:23, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia game
Sounds like a good idea to me. Thanks! NawlinWiki 17:33, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- Well, we tend not to redirect pages in the main namespace to Wikipedia project pages, because of the potential for confusion, the need to be redistributable, WP:ASR and so on. If you want to put it back, do so and I won't delete it again (though you may find someone else takes it to RfD) – – Gurch 13:35, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
s2bu—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 137.132.3.11 (talk)
[edit] Eddie Klint
You asked why the {{prod}} tag was replaced - the tag was removed by the author, yet no evidence of notability wa provided. - Tiswas(t/c) 10:44, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- Read the first part of WP:PROD#Conflicts: If anyone, including the article's creator, removes Template:Prod from an article for any reason, do not put it back (emphasis not added by me - it's in the policy)... Prod is only for 100% non-controversial deletions. Let me know if you have questions. —Wknight94 (talk) 11:40, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The Rosebud Grain Company
Thanks for your note.
The Rosebud Grain Company has been out of business for over 20 years, this was not an effort to promote business, but to capture history.
No problem, when I'm done it'll make sense. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lonchill (talk • contribs) 14:40, 29 December 2006 (UTC).