User talk:Primalchaos
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] S-mine picture
Hey,
I saw the s-mine article you nominated for peer review, and i decided to nominate a diagram from the article as a featured picture canidate. You can check out and comment about that here.--ZeWrestler Talk 12:29, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] DYK
 |
Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article military chocolate, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
[edit] Marcus Aurelius bust
I am writing to inform you that unfortunately the bust of Marcus Aurelius you are using in your page was wrongly attributed. It is infact a bust of Septimius Severus (see image talk). --Panairjdde 08:13, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] DYK
|
Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article bootleg turn, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
- And the article, by the way, is very well done. Nice job. 152.17.63.85 03:12, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] DYK
|
On June 6, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Walking City, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
|
On 8 August 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lapis Niger, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
|
On 22 August 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article LORAX (robot), which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Robert anton wilson.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Robert anton wilson.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{fairusein|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jkelly 00:55, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image:M1897shotgun.jpg
This image needs a source and a proper license. Rmhermen 16:30, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Ww2marineshotgun.jpg
This image needs a source to support its current license. Rmhermen 16:30, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image tagging for Image:Space_rogue_cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Space_rogue_cover.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:56, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] B-2 image on United States
Hi Primal chaos! I was curious as to why you removed the B-2 image from the US article; I thought it fit in well. Feel free to respond on my talk page. Thanks! | AndonicO Talk | Sign Here 01:51, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Oh, okay. Thanks for explaining. | AndonicO Talk | Sign Here 02:03, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Re:
Thanks for your message, but they deleted the article anyway, even though it could have been "no consensus". It is difficult for me to keep my cool when people who themselves have strong POVs are attacking me for the same thing. Thats frustrating. Look at the bunch of articles on Islam, for example - why aren't these same people screaming about the anti-Islam POV and unreliable sources there?? You see this is what it comes down to, delete this, delete that. It's their fear and their hatred. Instead of adding a counter POV, they only know how to delete and attack and defame. Is unfortunate that Wikipedia works better in theory than in practice, but this is the human nature. Khodavand 05:45, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Democratic Party
Trying for a NPOV on the Democratic Party article. Center-Left should describe Democrats and Center-Right Republicans. Which party is more "Centrist" is a POV I think. Oleanna1104 01:32, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanx for adding that citation about Beautiful Day. Interesting:) Oleanna1104 22:52, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] 300 Edits
You need to reference your contributions to Wikipedia. Your recent additions tot he 300 article are very likely going to be reverted by the first editor that comes along. Considering how many people are reading too much into the movie as it is, the only material that will be allowed to remain is that which is cited from a reliable source. If you cannot cite your addition, you would be doing everyone a service by removing it yourself until you can cite the information properly.Arcayne 14:11, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
- Not toput words into Bignole's mouth, but I think he's referring to the fact that, while the info you cited is solid stuff, its connection to the film (ie, the perception that Thermoplylae is the turning point in the war and not Salamis) needs to be made by someone more authoritative (referentially-speaking) than yourself - someone whose opinion can be cited. I know you are making good faith edits, and I don't want you to lose heart that your edits aren't being appreciated. Trust me, they are. :)
- Perhaps you can find a source that ties the two together?Arcayne 15:15, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
- Just added it.--Primal Chaos 15:16, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Edit Summaries
Please do not leave edit summaries like this one [1] again as they can be interpreted as hostile. Thank you.--Jersey Devil 05:57, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
