Talk:Prince Nicholas of Montenegro

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material of any kind that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libelous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.

Biography Portal

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ]

This page reads like a PR piece for the prince. It needs professional neutral writing and sourcing. FearÉIREANN\^(caint) 21:00, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

It looks like a pretty straight rendition of biographical facts to me--I don't see anything that points to bias or lack of neutrality. Could we have a discussion of any specific points that need fixing or should the neutrality flag be removed? --Marlow4 20:27, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

What the proper terminology here? I doubt "pretender" is correct, since there seems to be little doubt about his claim. The title is defunct, but Nikola would be a legitamate claimant if the throne still existed. Kerowyn 18:32, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

The term pretender is used for anyone claiming a throne that no longer exists. Alexander, Crown Prince of Yugoslavia is a pretender, and he is a legitimate claimant. The term means no disrespect. Prsgodd e ss187 19:23, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Then the answer is pretty simple--there's already a page on pretenders, so I just added the link in on the main page.--Jonny-mt 16:33, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

The Official Website of the Royal House of Montenegro does not work so I removed it.