User talk:Presnell

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Welcome

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!

Whosyourjudas (talk) 02:36, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Yoism

I have responded to you comments on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yoism.Geni 18:18, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

  • Presnell, the vote for undeletion of Yoism is drawing to a close and it looks like it will be decided by a single vote or two. If you are interested in participating, it can be found here. Kriegman 15:01, 20 November 2005 (UTC)


[edit] Re: Your insightful vote on the Yoism VfD

In a message dated 10/22/2005 3:05:31 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, wiki@bofh.com writes: I have summarized everything on a page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Wikibofh/Yoism

To summarize the summary, yes, I discounted all of those votes. I can see how you would disagree with this, so I really do recommend VfU. It could be that the other admins will disagree with my rationale.

Respectfully -

Jot -- Jot Powers <wiki@bofh.com> http://www.bofh.com

This is very sad.

I invested great effort in this to see if the Wikipedia could overcome what others call devastating limitations. Though I do NOT support Larry Sanger's call for deference to "experts," I'm afraid the Wikipedia---in its ostensible call for openness---has created a new elite class of "experts" and is closing the door.

When 6 or 7 hyper-editors averaging way more than 2,000 edits each, none of whom had the chance to have---and none of whom voiced a willingness to wait for---the opportunity to actually experience the phenomenon being judged, ride roughshod over 7 or 8 editor-users (all with a least one prior, unrelated edit, but far less than 2,000) all of whom have carefully reviewed the phenomenon in question, this is quite sad.

We have created a new elite class of experts who have power.

The rest of us can just go home. The experts are in charge.

Dan Kriegman 03:37, 23 October 2005 (UTC)