User:Preschooler.at.heart

My name is Austin, and i'm currently 17 years old. i've been homeschooled since 4th grade, am heavily involved in acting and the preforming arts, and am currently taking a full load at the Metropolitan Community Colleges of Kansas City. possible majors include Theatre, Buisness, and World Domination. I was born in Independence, Missouri. I am heavily interested in the Performing Arts, and am a Stanislavski Method actor. I consider myself a conservative, but i also try to keep an open mind and not resort to bigotry. I Follow Jesus Christ. I attend a baptist church, but I don't consider myself a member of any christian denomination or sect, because there's no point in fighting with each other.

Countries Visited:

* * * * * * * *

U.S. States Visited:

* * * *

* * * *

* * * *

* * * *

* * * *

* * * *

* * * *

Stances on Wikipedia

• I think that we should have articles on people, like civic leaders, who aren't globally notable or known but have actually made a difference in the lives of other people. that means that mayors and state congressmen get legitimate articles and Kevin Federline gets a stub.
• I think that beurocracy doesn't always help. to some extent, it is nessesary, but i don't think we should go so far not to show personality that we don't get anything done. i think articles should remain professional, but i don't think we need to go so far as Revert/delete wars over POV Userboxes. people should be able to state thier opinion.
• A high edit count is commendable, but not necessesarily a representation of a wikipedian's worth.
• If someone leaves a comment on your talk page, and you want to respond, you should leave a comment on thier talk page and not expect them to come to you to read your comment.
• I think that the main criteria for adminship should be trustworthiness. it's not like there's a limit, so if we can trust a person not to jack things up, we shouldn't deny them because of petty squabbles and "you don't have a high enough edit count".the main question to ask, then, is "will giving admin rights to this person benefit wikipedia?"
• Wikipedia shouldn't be censored for minors, but we shouldn't go out of our way or make it a point to expose nudity, suggestiveness, or explicit language in articles and article talk pages.