Talk:Prayer Tower
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Oklahoma, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Oklahoma. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale. |
[edit] Offended
[edit] sensitive body part
Kralizec, If you are teached enough (read brainwashed) you will se holly spirit above the tower.
But i am offended by the tower - which stands for sexual act, very similar to San Pietro in Vatican. The monument in Vatican is from Egypt and stands for P**** (sensitive body part) of Baal.
As a follower of Jesus I found this not acceptable. You should not call my page editing a vandalism, supressing my voice. That is called information control, or MindControl.
"In times of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act"
Am i crazy? Just try googling for penis/phalus/phalic and monument/tower/architecture. Please really try. And tell me if i am wrong. This tower may be seen as sexual act. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.245.124.127 (talk • contribs) 10:45, 10 June 2005 (UTC)
- Phallic symbol conspiracy theories are not relevant to this article. I am sorry if you are offended by all architectural objects that are tall and pointy, but wikipedia is a repository of facts, not opinions. --Kralizec! 16:02, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Unholy spirit
Your unholy "holy spirit burning on top" conspiracy theory is a fact? Are you kidding me? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.245.124.127 (talk • contribs) 17:51, 18 June 2005 (UTC)
- Huh? --Kralizec! 05:57, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
You are selling 'holly spirit flame' as a fact. Holly spirit is nothing but opinion, or 'holly spirit conspiracy theory'. Viewit it as unholly sperm, not holly flame, might be as much (or more) valid. Stop selling your 'holly spirit flame conspiracy theory' as a fact here. When people shape fingers into shape similar to your prayer tower, all will agree its the basic way of describing sexual act '-0-'. Its not conspiracy theory. Even school kids will recognize this one. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.245.101.79 (talk • contribs) 14:23, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
