Talk:Praemonitus Praemunitus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject Jewish history. An attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardized and up-to-date resource for all articles related to Jewish history.

If you would like to help improve this and other articles related to the subject, also consider joining the project. All interested editors are welcome. This template adds articles to Category:WikiProject Jewish history articles.


This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page. You can discuss the Project at its talk page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
--Ludvikus 00:24, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Wikiquote

Does this belong in wikiquote? --Yono 23:35, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Disambiguation?

I do not think it should be in wikiquote.
But perhaps it should have a disambiguation.
To distinguish the [[adage] from the book title of the Protocols of Zion.
And perhaps its nolomger a stub.
yours, etc. Ludvikus 22:02, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Protocols of Zion

This is the title of an annotated 1920 American edition of "The Protocols." It is exceedingly rare as an antisemitica item. It is a third (3rd) distinct translation into the English language. The first is The Jewish Peril. The second is The Protocols and World Revolution. Yours truly, --Ludvikus 00:35, 6 December 2006 (UTC)


Physically, in its artistic, bibliophilic, appearance, it is the most beautiful--esthetically.

Of course, that is especially the case, if one diregards its stupid contents!!!
Having looked at it, at the NYPL, it was treated like a valued rare book--it was layed out for me like one would expect with the Holy Bible. --Ludvikus 00:41, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] This is a Book & a Book Title

Maybe DISAMBIGUATION is required for "Praemonitus praemunitus" - the Latinadage? Yours truly, --Ludvikus 11:59, 6 December 2006 (UTC)